<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:amplify="http://amplify.com/xmlns/amplify"
>

<channel>
	<title>Bit Briefs  &#187; Consumer Packaged Goods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/category/consumer-packaged-goods/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Trends, News and Statistics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Online Coupon Demand Growing Fast</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comThe economy may have come back from the brink, but demand for digital coupons appears to be picking up steam, according to new data released by Coupons.com.  
The company said savings from coupons printed out or loaded to a loyalty card from its online properties doubled to more than $1 billion from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 526C0FFB-9EF4-4ECB-8FD4-27E84ED987C4 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The economy may have come back from the brink, but demand for digital coupons appears to be picking up steam, according to new data released by Coupons.com. </p><p> 
The company said savings from coupons printed out or loaded to a loyalty card from its online properties doubled to more than $1 billion from $529 million a year ago. The value of savings in June alone hit $110 million, the highest total to date for any single month via Coupons.com. That increase has come despite traffic to the site actually dropping in the last year from 18.2 million monthly visitors to 14.5 million. </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=132604&amp;nid=116942</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Fan Value = $136.38</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brand fans are worth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comMany social media marketers are eager to tie a hard number to the value of their efforts. To that end, firms have attempted to analyze the worth of fans and followers on social networking sites like Facebook.

Digital consulting firm Syncapse and research company Hotspex have come up with an empirical formula that puts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Many social media marketers are eager to tie a hard number to the value of their efforts. To that end, firms have attempted to analyze the worth of fans and followers on social networking sites like Facebook.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Digital consulting firm <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.syncapse.com">Syncapse</a> and research company <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hotspex.com">Hotspex</a> have come up with an empirical formula that puts an average value of $136.38 on the Facebook fans of the site&#8217;s 20 biggest corporate brands. Most of that value comes from how much the fans will spend on the brand&#8217;s products, with additional dollars coming from customer loyalty, recommendations and earned media.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A/62ED0CC2-DC57-4BF0-A78E-AF786942383F" alt="Average Value of a Facebook Fan in North America, June 2010" width="325"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The study found that people spent significantly more on products they were fans of, compared with consumers who were not fans. In the case of many of Facebook&#8217;s most popular food and beverage marketers, fan spending was more than double that of non-fans.
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A/D4829F2A-315E-485F-AB70-5F87B0B08687" alt="Select Food/Beverage Brands on Facebook, Ranked by Average Product Spending of a Facebook Fan vs. Non-Fan in North America, June 2010" width="246"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The pattern of increased fan spending held across all of the top 20 brands on Facebook, with differences ranging from 51% for Oreo fans to 168% for fans of Nokia.

</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761">Read more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>13% of Online Users Bought Virtual Goods in Last 12 Months</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[annual survey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[magid associates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[north america]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[playspan release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.prweb.com   
                  
                    
            [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: D5400474-3985-40B3-B7F0-2DE4A194D1EC CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm" href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm">www.prweb.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table align="left" id="AutoGeneratedID-0"><tbody><tr>   <td valign="top" align="center"><table width="250px">
                  <tbody><tr>
                    <td>
                      <img src="http://www.prweb.com/images_v4/quote_left.gif" />
                        <a rel="nofollow" title="http://www.playspan.com" href="http://www.playspan.com">&#8220;There&#8217;s been a substantial increase in the number of consumers buying digital goods and an upward trend of players spending more on average than in the previous year,&#8221; said Mike Vorhaus, President, Magid Advisors.</a>
                      <img src="http://www.prweb.com/images_v4/quote_right.gif" />
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
According to the study, 13% of the overall population surveyed reported that they had bought virtual goods in the last 12 months, with the mean of digital good purchase up 14% from $87 in 2009 to $99 in 2010. The median of digital goods purchase is $50 in 2010, a 67% improvement from $30 in 2009. In terms of the heaviest concentration of digital goods buyers, iPhone owners took over the #1 spot, moving from 28% of iPhone owners in 2009 to 43% in 2010. Virtual worlds came in second place with 41% of regular visitors having bought a digital good. Of weekly handheld and mobile gamers, 33% and 32%, respectively, bought digital goods. Overall, more than one-fifth (21%) of those who bought digital goods said they plan to spend more in the next 12 months. Among ways to purchase digital goods, 16% of digital goods buyers say they have used Facebook Credits.
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Largest demographic of consumers who have reported buying virtual goods:<br />
1. Males ages 18 to 24 (31%)<br />
2. Males ages 8 to 11 and 12 to 17 (both at 23%)<br />
3. Males 25 to 34 (21%)<br />
4. Females ages 8 to 11 (16%)<br />
5. Females ages 12 to 17 (15%)<br />
6. Females ages 18 to 24 (14%)
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Where consumers are buying from:<br />
1. In a game (57%)<br />
2. The official Web site outside the virtual world or game (38%)<br />
3. E-commerce site such as PlaySpan (16%)<br />
4. Another player (8%)<br />
5. Other (8%)<br />
6. Not sure (8%)
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Type of game or environment where consumers have bought from:<br />
1. A free, web-based game (37%)<br />
2. A social network site, other than a game (31%)<br />
3. A free multiplayer computer game (29%)<br />
4. A game on a social network site (29%)<br />
5. A connected console marketplace (21%)<br />
6. A paid, subscription based multiplayer game (18%)<br />
7. An online virtual world (11%)<br />
8. Other (6%)
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Concentration of virtual goods purchasers within ethnic groups:<br />
1. Asian American (26%)<br />
2. Latinos (20%)<br />
3. African American or Black (15%)<br />
4. Caucasians (11%)<br />
5. All others (12%)
</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm" href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm">Read more at www.prweb.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.prweb.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Retail Spending Reaches $39 Billion</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/10/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/10/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[billion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[percent]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/02/10/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.webpronews.comSee more at www.webpronews.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1DBA6681-76FA-48D5-AD07-A79EDDCA990E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/02/09/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion-in-q4?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+%28WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed%29" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/02/09/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion-in-q4?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+%28WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed%29">www.webpronews.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/02/09/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion-in-q4?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+%28WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed%29"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1DBA6681-76FA-48D5-AD07-A79EDDCA990E/2B02934E-7A1A-421B-A5F3-A16F62712266" alt="Ecommerce-Spending" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/02/09/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion-in-q4?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+%28WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed%29" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/02/09/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion-in-q4?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+%28WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed%29">See more at www.webpronews.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/10/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2010/02/09/online-retail-spending-reaches-39-billion-in-q4?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+webpronews%2Fall+%28WebProNews%3A+Index+Feed%29</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.webpronews.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior Marketer Top Priorities in 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social networks top priority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThe &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

Senior marketers reported that social networks and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Senior marketers reported that social networks and applications were their biggest priority for 2010, followed closely by digital infrastructure. While social media marketing looks set to stay top of mind, a majority of respondents considered a range of digital activities at least &#8220;important,&#8221; with only games failing to inspire widespread interest. 
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA/D3F72E7C-7992-402D-A96C-EBE8245A2349" alt="Top Priorities in 2010 According to Senior Marketers Worldwide (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coupons &#38; Sales Resonate Best in Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/11/coupons-sales-resonate-best-in-social-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/11/coupons-sales-resonate-best-in-social-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/11/coupons-sales-resonate-best-in-social-networks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comThe study results also indicate that consumers frequently talk about, recommend or review products on social networks:46% say they would talk about or recommend a product on Facebook.44% of Twitter users have recommended a product.36% of YouTube users have gone to an online retailer or ecommerce site after learning about a brand on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 5C24F736-F170-4258-ABCA-D284A1CDEE02 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/5C24F736-F170-4258-ABCA-D284A1CDEE02/ECA362EC-9AAE-460D-99EE-405521F68083" alt="performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009.jpg" width="384"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The study results also indicate that consumers frequently talk about, recommend or review products on social networks:</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>46% say they would talk about or recommend a product on Facebook.</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>44% of Twitter users have recommended a product.</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>36% of YouTube users have gone to an online retailer or ecommerce site after learning about a brand on a social network site.</LI><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/11/coupons-sales-resonate-best-in-social-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnet-users-most-open-to-ads-with-coupons-deals-11029/performics-roi-research-message-resonate-consumers-social-networks-november-2009jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SHERPA: How Email Marketing Budgets Changed in 2009 by Industry</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
			SUMMARY: Email has not only been spared the ax that fell heavily on most marketing budget line items, it seems to have actually benefited from the down economy. This boon wasn&#8217;t skewed by a few email-reliant sectors, it occurred in every industry participating in our benchmark survey.       [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: F4243E3F-38E8-45D5-A0AB-F9FF8CB6C0A9 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="articleSummary">
			<STRONG>SUMMARY:</STRONG> Email has not only been spared the ax that fell heavily on most marketing budget line items, it seems to have actually benefited from the down economy. This boon wasn&#8217;t skewed by a few email-reliant sectors, it occurred in every industry participating in our benchmark survey.                                                      		</DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/F4243E3F-38E8-45D5-A0AB-F9FF8CB6C0A9/7D230667-AEF3-404C-A4EC-73A809718C80" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year-over-Year% Change in Online Advertising Spend by Industry</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comYear-over-Year% Change in Online Advertising Spend by Industry (U.S., August 2009)&#160;Estimated $ on Top Social Network SitesYOY% GrowthIndustryAug-08Aug-09 On Social &#160;Networks&#160;On All &#160;Sites Entertainment$1,097,700$10,012,800812%40%Travel$473,700$2,198,200364%-11%Business to Business $683,400$1,941,700184% -8%Automotive$1,110,200$3,085,800178%&#160;-26%Health$1,131,500$2,754,900 143%8%Web Media$11,231,800$26,855,700139%30%Software$526,400$1,202,500128%-29%Financial Services&#160;$3,233,900$6,415,900 98%-10%Public Services$6,836,500$13,203,10093%13%Telecommunications$12,449,500&#160;$23,550,30089%-1%Consumer Goods$1,913,400 $3,349,20075%8% Hardware &#38; Electronics$654,000 $1,022,90056%-47%Retail Goods &#38; Services$8,101,400$12,556,80055%-12%Source: Nielsen AdRelevanceRead more at www.mediapost.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><!--Session data--></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: FC4C883A-DC9C-4A07-BB50-0C4B4763BBA4 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="5"><P><STRONG>Year-over-Year% Change in Online Advertising Spend by Industry </STRONG>(U.S., August 2009)</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>&#160;</P></TD><TD valign="top" colspan="2"><P align="center"><STRONG><EM>Estimated $ on Top Social Network Sites</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top" colspan="2"><P align="center"><STRONG><EM>YOY%</EM></STRONG> Growth</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>Industry</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>Aug-08</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>Aug-09 </EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>On Social &#160;Networks</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>&#160;On All &#160;Sites </EM></STRONG></P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Entertainment</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,097,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$10,012,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">812%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">40%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Travel</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$473,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$2,198,200</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">364%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-11%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Business to Business </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$683,400</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,941,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">184% </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-8%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Automotive</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,110,200</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$3,085,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">178%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">&#160;-26%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Health</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,131,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$2,754,900 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">143%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">8%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Web Media</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$11,231,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$26,855,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">139%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">30%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Software</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$526,400</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,202,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">128%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-29%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Financial Services</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">&#160;$3,233,900</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$6,415,900 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">98%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-10%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Public Services</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$6,836,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$13,203,100</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">93%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">13%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Telecommunications</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$12,449,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">&#160;$23,550,300</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">89%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-1%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Consumer Goods</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,913,400 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$3,349,200</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">75%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">8% </P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Hardware &amp; Electronics</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$654,000 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,022,900</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">56%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-47%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Retail Goods &amp; Services</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$8,101,400</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$12,556,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">55%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-12%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="5"><P><EM>Source: Nielsen AdRelevance</EM></P></TD></TR></table><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 25 Retail Sites, July 2009</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/21/top-25-retail-sites-july-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/21/top-25-retail-sites-july-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/21/top-25-retail-sites-july-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from blog.compete.comSee more at blog.compete.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 4322249F-9ABC-4833-AB52-F2276EA66495 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.compete.com/2009/09/17/top-25-retail-sites-july/" href="http://blog.compete.com/2009/09/17/top-25-retail-sites-july/">blog.compete.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.compete.com/2009/09/17/top-25-retail-sites-july/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/4322249F-9ABC-4833-AB52-F2276EA66495/BCEBEBB3-55A4-4F43-869A-DFC6D131630C" alt="" width="240"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.compete.com/2009/09/17/top-25-retail-sites-july/" href="http://blog.compete.com/2009/09/17/top-25-retail-sites-july/">See more at blog.compete.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/21/top-25-retail-sites-july-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blog.compete.com/2009/09/17/top-25-retail-sites-july/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blog.compete.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 in 5 Tweets are Brand/Product Related</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/1-in-5-tweets-are-brandproduct-related/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/1-in-5-tweets-are-brandproduct-related/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Clip</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/15/1-in-5-tweets-are-brandproduct-related/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From a study conducted by Penn StateClipped from live.psu.eduCompanies are also benefiting from Twitter, where 20 percent of the tweets contain requests for product information or responses to the requests, according to Jim Jansen, associate professor of information science and technology in the College of Information Sciences and Technology (IST) at Penn State.&#8220;People are using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>From a study conducted by Penn State</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: A5167759-DF7C-4976-8A96-0DB5BB3CAE86 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446" href="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446">live.psu.edu</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Companies are also benefiting from Twitter, where 20 percent of the tweets contain requests for product information or responses to the requests, according to Jim Jansen, associate professor of information science and technology in the College of Information Sciences and Technology (IST) at Penn State.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>&#8220;People are using tweets to express their reaction, both positive and negative, as they engage with these products and services,&#8221; said Jansen. &#8220;Tweets are about as close as one can get to the customer point of purchase for products and services.&#8221;</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>he team looked for tweets mentioning a brand and why the brand was mentioned &#8212; to inform others, express a view on the brand or something else &#8212; and found that people were using tweets to connect with the products.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>About 20 percent of the tweets contained product information in the form of asking and providing, thus giving companies a &#8220;rich source&#8221; of information concerning issues and questions that customers have regarding their products.<span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446" href="http://live.psu.edu/story/41446">Read more at live.psu.edu</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/1-in-5-tweets-are-brandproduct-related/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://live.psu.edu/story/41446</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>live.psu.edu</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Rates By Vertical</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/31/ad-rates-by-vertical/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/31/ad-rates-by-vertical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/31/ad-rates-by-vertical/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Industries included are Travel, Technology, Automotive, Health, News, Moms, Affluentials, Sports, Entertainment, Real Estate, Business, Fashion, Food.  All advertising costs are CPM&#8230;Clipped from www.businessinsider.comThe publishers that charge advertisers the highest rates are those in the travel, tech and automotive verticals, according to Adify, which buys media on 12,000 publishers for 200 ad networks.
Below, see a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>Industries included are Travel, Technology, Automotive, Health, News, Moms, Affluentials, Sports, Entertainment, Real Estate, Business, Fashion, Food.  All advertising costs are CPM&#8230;</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 69B317C9-303E-4FE8-B459-045D03838EF2 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184">www.businessinsider.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/69B317C9-303E-4FE8-B459-045D03838EF2/B0F00F0D-E779-4939-8547-0AE8C6BBE73B" alt="ad-rates-by-vertical-q2-09.gif" width="384"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The publishers that charge advertisers the highest rates are those in the travel, tech and automotive verticals, according to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://adify.com/">Adify</A>, which buys media on 12,000 publishers for 200 ad networks.</P>
<P>Below, see a chart from Adify that shows what rate &#8212; CPM, or cost per 1,000 impressions &#8212; publishers from 13 different verticals have charged advertisers over the past three quarters.</P>
<P>Travel leads with a $19.89 CPM; tech is second at $16.01; food is last at $3.63.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184">Read more at www.businessinsider.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/31/ad-rates-by-vertical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cpm-verticals-2009-8#comment-4a975ecc9d4b62295e23e184</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.businessinsider.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Market Share of Visits to Comparison Shopping Tools</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/31/weekly-market-share-of-visits-to-comparison-shopping-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/31/weekly-market-share-of-visits-to-comparison-shopping-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/31/weekly-market-share-of-visits-to-comparison-shopping-tools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comAccording to Heather Dougherty, Director, Research at Hitwise, Bing Shopping, in the 8 weeks since launch, grew its market share of comparison shopping 169% among key providers in the category.&#160; &#160;  Weekly Market Share of Visits to Comparison Shopping   Tools (% of Visits in Category &#38; Change   in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1211C5F3-ADAC-41A4-8F64-39621844F323 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>According to Heather Dougherty, Director, Research at Hitwise, Bing Shopping, in the 8 weeks since launch, grew its market share of comparison shopping 169% among key providers in the category.&#160; &#160;  </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="4"><P><STRONG>Weekly Market Share of Visits to Comparison Shopping   Tools</STRONG> (% of Visits in Category &amp; Change   in 8 Weeks from Bing entry)</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>&#160;</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top" colspan="3">   <P align="center"><STRONG><EM>Share of   Visits</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Shopping Tools</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>WkEnd 6/6/09</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>WkEnd 8/8/09</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>% Change</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Yahoo! Shopping</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">24.07</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">22.7%</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-5%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Bizrate.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">15.96</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">15.57</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-2</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Shopzilla.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">13.95</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">13.23</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-5</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Bing.com/shopping</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">4.40</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">10.86</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">169</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Nextag.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.20</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">10.34</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">12</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Bestprice.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">11.79</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">8.41</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-29</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Pronto.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.41</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">4.55</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">33</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Become.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">4.05</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.67</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-9</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Shop.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">4.93</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.35</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-32</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Pricegrabber.com</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.96</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">2.96</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">-25</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top" colspan="4">   <P><EM>Source: Hitwise, August 2009</EM></P></TD></TR><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/31/weekly-market-share-of-visits-to-comparison-shopping-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112101</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word of Mouth Spending Data</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comAccording to new research from PQ Media, spending on word-of-mouth marketing rose 14.2% to $1.54 billion in 2008, despite the worst economic recession in 70 years. However, WoM spending is on&#160;pace to grow another 10.2% this year, placing it among the fastest growing advertising and marketing segments.PQ Media defines WoM marketing as an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: C06853C3-B3AA-46D0-8C87-9069BD92F39C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>According to new research from PQ Media, spending on word-of-mouth marketing rose 14.2% to $1.54 billion in 2008, despite the worst economic recession in 70 years. However, WoM spending is on&#160;pace to grow another 10.2% this year, placing it among the fastest growing advertising and marketing segments.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>PQ Media defines WoM marketing as an alternative marketing strategy which encourages consumers to dialogue about products and services through various online and offline tactics, often facilitated by brand ambassadors. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Industry spending increased at a compound annual growth rate of 37.6% from 2003 to 2008, as the rise in popularity of blogs, social networks and online communities led brands to shift dollars to WoM as part of integrated media solutions in their quest to engage more elusive consumers.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Total spending on WoM is expected to increase at a CAGR of 14.5% from 2008 to 2013. Both major sectors - content &amp; services and ancillary products - will post strong gains and contribute to overall growth. Ancillary products spending will increase faster than content &amp; services spending primarily because the market is smaller with more growth potential.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Patrick Quinn, President and CEO of PQ Media, notes that &#8220;The most influential marketer in a consumer&#8217;s life is someone they know and trust, such as a family member, friend or colleague&#8230;&#8221; </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="2"><P><STRONG>% Share of WoM Spending by Marketers in 2008</STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Brand Market</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Share of WoM Spend</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Consumer Goods Products</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">17.4%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Food &amp; Drink</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">12.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Finance &amp; B2B Services</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.5%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Electronics &amp; Telecom</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.4%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Retail</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Auto &amp; Transportation</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">8.6%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Entertainment &amp; Media</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">7.5%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Apparel &amp; Accessories</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">6.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Health Care &amp; Pharma</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">4.1%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Sports &amp; Gaming</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.6%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Travel &amp; Leisure</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.3%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Home &amp; Garden</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Other</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">5.8%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Total</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">100.0%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top" colspan="2">   <P><EM>Source: PQ Media, July 2009</EM></P></TD></TR><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore Research:  Online Influences Offline Behavior</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geographic Insights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tips - Search Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.mediapost.com
Several comScore studies have confirmed that online campaigns drive offline sales, according to Fulgoni. In the first study, comScore took four categories, 53 brands and 200 of the most trafficked sites. The company looked at people exposed to display advertising and what they did in the month following. Findings reveal that 18% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 319889F9-6558-41C0-A4BC-EF45731F1FA7 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>
Several comScore studies have confirmed that online campaigns drive offline sales, according to Fulgoni. In the first study, comScore took four categories, 53 brands and 200 of the most trafficked sites. The company looked at people exposed to display advertising and what they did in the month following. Findings reveal that 18% searched on the brand advertised and 29% went to the advertisers&#8217; sites. Consumers
who were exposed to the display advertising spent 55% more time than the average visitors to these sites the next month. The rise in time spent is matched by a similar increase in page views &#8212; about 51%. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>
Then, comScore analyzed the impact that online campaigns have on retail sales by matching the name and the address of consumers to retail loyalty card databases. The supermarket Kroger, for example, has issued about 60 million loyalty cards, which provide a massive data set to understand the degree that online search and display campaigns drive retail sales. The findings suggest a lift that is five times stronger when people are exposed to search ads alone, compared with display. Search alone produces an 82% lift, compared with display at 16%, and 119% when search and display are combined. About 82% of online ad campaigns measured by comScore have generated an average lift of 22% in CPG brand sales in retail stores. </P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retargeting Working Well for Etailers</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/17/retargeting-working-well-for-etailers/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/17/retargeting-working-well-for-etailers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/07/17/retargeting-working-well-for-etailers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.mediapost.comFetchBack Thursday launched a new analytics suite that offers insights into the conversion cycle for e-tail. Research during the development of the tools revealed that nearly half of consumers return to retail sites quickly after being served retargeting ads. 

They have found that in online electronics, retail, apparel, home and health, that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: F14CE465-9F90-42B9-923A-F3FD629AD22E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109964" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109964">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109964"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>FetchBack Thursday launched a new analytics suite that offers insights into the conversion cycle for e-tail. Research during the development of the tools revealed that nearly half of consumers return to retail sites quickly after being served retargeting ads. 
<P>
They have found that in online electronics, retail, apparel, home and health, that on average, 42.9% of consumers returned to the retail site that generated the FetchBack-served retargeting ad &#8212; and that was within the first hour of seeing the ad.  
</P><P>
FetchBack&#8217;s President and CEO says, &#8220;Knowing how quickly a prospect returns to an advertiser&#8217;s site after viewing a retargeting ad, or how many impressions each prospect receives before converting is important information that allows advertisers to optimize their campaign.&#8221; 
</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109964" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109964">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/17/retargeting-working-well-for-etailers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109964</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Store Brand Switching by Product Category</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/14/store-brand-switching-by-product-category/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/14/store-brand-switching-by-product-category/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/07/14/store-brand-switching-by-product-category/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned in the article, the trend seems to be &#8220;less-risk-more-switch&#8221;.Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comSee more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>As mentioned in the article, the trend seems to be &#8220;less-risk-more-switch&#8221;.</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 120ACAB5-1C5C-46CA-986A-0DC07384CF46 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/kids-pets-inspire-less-brand-switching-9778/epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/kids-pets-inspire-less-brand-switching-9778/epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/kids-pets-inspire-less-brand-switching-9778/epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/120ACAB5-1C5C-46CA-986A-0DC07384CF46/97DDFF88-FBD6-4766-ABF3-27575D4F510D" alt="epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009.jpg" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/kids-pets-inspire-less-brand-switching-9778/epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/kids-pets-inspire-less-brand-switching-9778/epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009jpg/">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/14/store-brand-switching-by-product-category/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/kids-pets-inspire-less-brand-switching-9778/epsilon-targeting-switching-store-brands-product-category-july-2009jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>90% of Consumers Trust Friends&#8217; Recommendations Online</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/13/90-of-consumers-trust-friends-recommendations-online/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/13/90-of-consumers-trust-friends-recommendations-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web Usability and Landing Page Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/07/13/90-of-consumers-trust-friends-recommendations-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.mediapost.comAccording to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries, recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising worldwide. 90% of consumers surveyed said that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70% trusted consumer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 127DBBD2-20E3-4A8C-A360-595B0F0CF58F CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>According to the latest Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey of over 25,000 Internet consumers from 50 countries, recommendations from personal acquaintances or opinions posted by consumers online are the most trusted forms of advertising worldwide. 90% of consumers surveyed said that they trust recommendations from people they know, while 70% trusted consumer opinions posted online.  </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TR><TD width="383" valign="top" colspan="2"><P><STRONG>Forms of Advertising in Which Consumers Trust   &#8220;Somewhat&#8221; or &#8220;Completely&#8221;</STRONG> (April, 2009)</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Advertising</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Percent of Respondents Trusting</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Recommendations from people known</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">90%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Consumer opinions posted online</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">70%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Brand websites</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">70%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Editorial content (e.g. newspaper article) </P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">69%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Brand sponsorships</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">64%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>TV</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">62%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Newspaper</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">61%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Magazines</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">59%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Billboards / outdoor advertising</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">55%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Radio</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">55%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Emails signed up for</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">54%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Ads before movies</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">52%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Search engine results ads</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">41%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Online video ads</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">37%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Online banner ads</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">33%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Text ads on mobile phones</P>   </TD>   <TD width="147" valign="top">   <P align="right">24%&#160;</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD width="383" valign="top" colspan="2">   <P><EM>Source: Nielsen Global Online Consumer Survey, April   2009&#160;</EM></P></TD></TR><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/13/90-of-consumers-trust-friends-recommendations-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=109610</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Fears = Abandoned Carts</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/29/security-fears-abandoned-carts/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/29/security-fears-abandoned-carts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/06/29/security-fears-abandoned-carts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.webpronews.comNearly three- quarters (72%) of consumers said the economy has not changed the way they shop online. Instead concerns about online security and personal information are the biggest drivers leading to abandoned online sales. Close to half of consumers have abandoned their shopping cart due to security fears.More than 90 percent of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1B727C0C-AEE2-4D2C-AD15-F937A8FBB103 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears">www.webpronews.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Nearly three- quarters (72%) of consumers said the economy has not changed the way they shop online. Instead concerns about online security and personal information are the biggest drivers leading to abandoned online sales. Close to half of consumers have abandoned their shopping cart due to security fears.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>More than 90 percent of consumers are concerned about their security when shopping on a new or unknown website, and 47 percent look for trustmarks to feel safe when shopping on a lesser known site.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears">Read more at www.webpronews.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/29/security-fears-abandoned-carts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/06/29/online-shopping-affected-by-security-fears</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.webpronews.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Goods Display Ad Spend Up 57% Since Oct</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/22/consumer-goods-display-ad-spend-up-57-since-oct/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/22/consumer-goods-display-ad-spend-up-57-since-oct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/06/22/consumer-goods-display-ad-spend-up-57-since-oct/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from blog.nielsen.com


Site
Q1 &#8216;08 Image-Based Ad Impressions (000)
Q1 &#8216;09 Image-Based Ad Impressions (000)
Y-O-Y % Growth


YouTube
94,939
637,727
572%


AOL.com
115,746
323,142
179%


Oprah.com
129,027
202,815
57%


IMDb
516,138
162,598
-68%


Yahoo!
93,850
161,809
72%


Perezhilton.com
n/a
132,862
n/a


NBC
229,551
116,000
-49%


ABC
73,426
96,145
31%


People.com
110,967
74,851
-33%


MSN
161,890
69,866
-57%


Source: Nielsen AdRelevance





Quarter
Estimated Spend
Quarter-over-Quarter Growth


Q1 2007
99,814,750
n/a


Q1 2008
122,785,505
23%


Q1 2009
156,221,975
27%


Source: Nielsen AdRelevance


Read more at blog.nielsen.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 0C993399-F4E7-466D-911F-F19BBCF2C069 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/">blog.nielsen.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TABLE border="0" class="chart">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TH>Site</TH>
<TH>Q1 &#8216;08 Image-Based Ad Impressions (000)</TH>
<TH>Q1 &#8216;09 Image-Based Ad Impressions (000)</TH>
<TH>Y-O-Y % Growth</TH>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">YouTube</TD>
<TD>94,939</TD>
<TD>637,727</TD>
<TD>572%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">AOL.com</TD>
<TD>115,746</TD>
<TD>323,142</TD>
<TD>179%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">Oprah.com</TD>
<TD>129,027</TD>
<TD>202,815</TD>
<TD>57%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">IMDb</TD>
<TD>516,138</TD>
<TD>162,598</TD>
<TD>-68%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">Yahoo!</TD>
<TD>93,850</TD>
<TD>161,809</TD>
<TD>72%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">Perezhilton.com</TD>
<TD>n/a</TD>
<TD>132,862</TD>
<TD>n/a</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">NBC</TD>
<TD>229,551</TD>
<TD>116,000</TD>
<TD>-49%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">ABC</TD>
<TD>73,426</TD>
<TD>96,145</TD>
<TD>31%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">People.com</TD>
<TD>110,967</TD>
<TD>74,851</TD>
<TD>-33%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">MSN</TD>
<TD>161,890</TD>
<TD>69,866</TD>
<TD>-57%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TH colspan="4" class="table_meta">Source: Nielsen AdRelevance</TH>
</TR>
</TBODY>
</TABLE></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TABLE border="0" class="chart">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TH>Quarter</TH>
<TH>Estimated Spend</TH>
<TH>Quarter-over-Quarter Growth</TH>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">Q1 2007</TD>
<TD>99,814,750</TD>
<TD>n/a</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">Q1 2008</TD>
<TD>122,785,505</TD>
<TD>23%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class="axis">Q1 2009</TD>
<TD>156,221,975</TD>
<TD>27%</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TH colspan="4" class="table_meta">Source: Nielsen AdRelevance</TH>
</TR>
</TBODY>
</TABLE><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/">Read more at blog.nielsen.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/22/consumer-goods-display-ad-spend-up-57-since-oct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/online-display-ad-spend-of-consumer-goods-up-57-since-2007/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blog.nielsen.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>61% of Reluctant Consumers Can Be Positively Swayed Online</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/15/61-of-reluctant-consumers-can-be-positively-swayed-online/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/15/61-of-reluctant-consumers-can-be-positively-swayed-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web Usability and Landing Page Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/06/15/61-of-reluctant-consumers-can-be-positively-swayed-online/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from blog.searchenginewatch.comIn a survey conducted by Jupiter Research for Bazaarvoice and richrelevance, 61% of reluctant shoppers said they could be positively swayed by online shopping resources.

The niches most affected by hesitation are:


	Automotive - 50%
	Travel - 46%
	Electronics - 43%


Consumers are shopping around and leaving their options open. 42% visited 3 or more sites to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 35452E74-38ED-4714-AC0A-6FCE31828EE9 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090223-130813" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090223-130813">blog.searchenginewatch.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090223-130813"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>In a survey conducted by Jupiter Research for <A href="http://www.bazaarvoice.com/">Bazaarvoice</A> and <A href="http://www.richrelevance.com/">richrelevance</A>, 61% of reluctant shoppers said they could be positively swayed by online shopping resources.</P>

<P>The niches most affected by hesitation are:</P>

<UL>
	<LI>Automotive - 50%</LI>
	<LI>Travel - 46%</LI>
	<LI>Electronics - 43%</LI>
</UL>

<P>Consumers are shopping around and leaving their options open. 42% visited 3 or more sites to research their last purchase, and only 33% of online shoppers had made up their minds about the price they were willing to pay for their purchase in advance of going online to research.</P>

<P>That leaves some good wiggle room for sites and brands to compete. Before researching:</P>

<UL>
	<LI>31% had made up their minds on which item or title to choose</LI>
	<LI>23% knew which brand they wanted to buy</LI>
	<LI>16% knew which store they would purchase from</LI>
	<LI>13% knew when they would make their purchase</LI>
</UL>

<P>Once online, they trust the reviews and opinions of other consumers, so make sure your product offering is solid.<BR />
</P><UL><LI>77% look to user ratings and reviews </LI><LI>66% use recommendations based on other consumers&#8217; purchasing</LI><LI>65% use recommendations based on browsing behavior of fellow consumers</LI></UL><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090223-130813" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090223-130813">Read more at blog.searchenginewatch.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/15/61-of-reluctant-consumers-can-be-positively-swayed-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/090223-130813</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blog.searchenginewatch.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
