<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:amplify="http://amplify.com/xmlns/amplify"
>

<channel>
	<title>Bit Briefs  &#187; Conversion Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/category/conversion-metrics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Trends, News and Statistics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Sherpa Chart:  B2B Lead to Sales Cycle</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/sherpa-chart-b2b-lead-to-sales-cycle/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/sherpa-chart-b2b-lead-to-sales-cycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conversion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cycles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[generation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prospects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/sherpa-chart-b2b-lead-to-sales-cycle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.comSee more at www.marketingsherpa.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: ABE7275D-DFFD-4073-9351-46FC5AB426EC CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31674" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31674">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31674"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/ABE7275D-DFFD-4073-9351-46FC5AB426EC/8EA4B0F7-EDEF-44CC-91E8-036AAB8F1940" alt="View Chart Online"  width="384" height="226"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31674" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31674">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/sherpa-chart-b2b-lead-to-sales-cycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31674</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Coupon Demand Growing Fast</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[coupons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comThe economy may have come back from the brink, but demand for digital coupons appears to be picking up steam, according to new data released by Coupons.com.  
The company said savings from coupons printed out or loaded to a loyalty card from its online properties doubled to more than $1 billion from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 526C0FFB-9EF4-4ECB-8FD4-27E84ED987C4 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The economy may have come back from the brink, but demand for digital coupons appears to be picking up steam, according to new data released by Coupons.com. </p><p> 
The company said savings from coupons printed out or loaded to a loyalty card from its online properties doubled to more than $1 billion from $529 million a year ago. The value of savings in June alone hit $110 million, the highest total to date for any single month via Coupons.com. That increase has come despite traffic to the site actually dropping in the last year from 18.2 million monthly visitors to 14.5 million. </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132604&#038;nid=116942">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/online-coupon-demand-growing-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=132604&amp;nid=116942</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows that In-Text Ads Work</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/study-shows-that-in-text-ads-work/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/study-shows-that-in-text-ads-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[banners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[compared]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[in-text]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rectangle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/study-shows-that-in-text-ads-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comApparently, in-text advertisements, those seemingly annoying little ads that pop up when someone moves a cursor over a hot-linked piece of text in an article, can create impactful campaigns.   According to a comScore study,  Kontera&#8217;s  in-text targeted ads delivered five times greater brand awareness than traditional display ads, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 4995B228-FF80-4996-A21F-0C54517A3DCB CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-0">Apparently, in-text advertisements, those seemingly annoying little ads that pop up when someone moves a cursor over a hot-linked piece of text in an article, can create impactful campaigns.   According to a comScore study,  Kontera&#8217;s  in-text targeted ads delivered five times greater brand awareness than traditional display ads, and twice as much lift in brand purchase intent.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1">
The study suggests 34% of consumers strongly felt Kontera in-text ads &#8220;clutter the page,&#8221; compared with 61% for interstitials, 52% for video ads, 45% for rectangle ads, and 36% for banners.    </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-2">
Twenty-one percent of consumers strongly agreed the in-text ads are &#8220;related to content,&#8221; compared with 14% for rectangle ads,  14% for interstitials, 10% for video, 15% for Google text ads, and 11% for banners.    </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-3">
Thirty three percent say in-text ads a less intrusive ad format, compared with 40% for rectangle ads, 53% for video ads, 63% for interstitial ads, and 29% for banners.    </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=132156">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/study-shows-that-in-text-ads-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=132156</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misc. Search Stats for Q2 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efficient frontier]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paid-search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sequentially]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comA flurry of paid-search reports released Tuesday may have marketers&#8217; heads spinning, but each provides insights into specific parts of the process.
SearchIgnite released the Q2 2010 U.S. Search Market Report Tuesday. Year-over-year paid-search spend increased 14% in the U.S., following an 11% YoY increase, sequentially. 
Similar to Efficient Frontier&#8217;s report, SearchIgnite found retailers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: B64743C8-A209-494A-8CA6-BC7B842730ED CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>A flurry of paid-search reports released Tuesday may have marketers&#8217; heads spinning, but each provides insights into specific parts of the process.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1">
SearchIgnite released the Q2 2010 U.S. Search Market Report Tuesday. Year-over-year paid-search spend increased 14% in the U.S., following an 11% YoY increase, sequentially. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-2">
Similar to Efficient Frontier&#8217;s report, SearchIgnite found retailers spent more &#8212; about 7% &#8212; compared with the prior year. Microsoft&#8217;s search engine Bing gained market share by 26% from the year-ago quarter, but declined 9.6% sequentially. Overall, Bing dropped slightly to 6.2% share of search spend in the U.S., while Google and Yahoo reached 78.4% and 15.4%, respectively. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-3">
Google increased the average number of paid-search ads shown per search session by 15%, followed by Yahoo at 22% and Bing at 11%. More premium ads in sponsored listings and down the right rail don&#8217;t necessarily suggest good news, however. Increasing ad coverage can diminish returns, and result in a poor experience for consumers, according to the report. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-4">
Relying on Google for metrics, the report suggests that consumers can withstand between 5.5 and 6.0 ads per search query. Yahoo now serves up 6.85, making it unlikely the increase in ads will lead to additional revenue. Bing serves up about 3.85 ads per keyword, so it&#8217;s &#8220;extremely&#8221; likely that this will reflect in better-than-expected revenues for the search engine. Similarly, Google went from 4.97 to 5.72, so they could report healthy increases as well. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td> Google now monetizes nearly 8% more of their keyword searches. Stokes says keywords searched with no ads decreased from 43.6% in Q1 to 39.7% in June, making the inventory easier to monetize. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-6">
In the Americas, paid-search spending by tech companies increased 12% during the second quarter, while the Asia/Pacific region rose 33%, sequentially. Combined, spending in Europe, the Middle East and Africa grew 25%. Google&#8217;s China strategy and move to serve content from Hong Kong has influenced performance. During the second quarter, Google&#8217;s share in the region dropped from 69% to 61%, while Baidu&#8217;s share of paid-search spending rose to 22% from 12%, sequentially. </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=131916&amp;nid=116606</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Has Greater Conversion Impact: Consumer, Context, or Creative?</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/12/which-has-greater-conversion-impact-consumer-context-or-creative/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/12/which-has-greater-conversion-impact-consumer-context-or-creative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[attributes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dataxu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dataxu marketpulse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketpulse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/12/which-has-greater-conversion-impact-consumer-context-or-creative/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.dataxu.comSee more at www.dataxu.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 4BE35A76-1DFF-47ED-B0B2-FEBD2BB7EDE8 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.dataxu.com/blog/2010/06/dataxu-marketpulse-beyond-audience-what-drives-campaign-performance/" href="http://www.dataxu.com/blog/2010/06/dataxu-marketpulse-beyond-audience-what-drives-campaign-performance/">www.dataxu.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.dataxu.com/blog/2010/06/dataxu-marketpulse-beyond-audience-what-drives-campaign-performance/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/4BE35A76-1DFF-47ED-B0B2-FEBD2BB7EDE8/9676F3CB-12F7-4A7D-92CA-08B3D7ACCEE2" alt=""  width="384" height="135"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.dataxu.com/blog/2010/06/dataxu-marketpulse-beyond-audience-what-drives-campaign-performance/" href="http://www.dataxu.com/blog/2010/06/dataxu-marketpulse-beyond-audience-what-drives-campaign-performance/">See more at www.dataxu.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/12/which-has-greater-conversion-impact-consumer-context-or-creative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.dataxu.com/blog/2010/06/dataxu-marketpulse-beyond-audience-what-drives-campaign-performance/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.dataxu.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Industry &#38; Rich Media</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-industry-rich-media/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-industry-rich-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clip Tuck</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clickthrough]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[inadequacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recognize]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-industry-rich-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comInteraction time translates to real-world branding impactsOnline marketers recognize the inadequacy of the clickthrough as an ad performance metric but still rely on it for its simplicity and ease of use. A joint study from comScore and MediaMind (formerly Eyeblaster) gives marketers in the entertainment industry reason to look further, to measures of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: C0FE976D-CA1F-48A4-A39F-83E282617C86 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h3><span>Interaction time translates to real-world branding impacts</span></h3></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Online marketers recognize the inadequacy of the clickthrough as an ad performance metric but <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007679">still rely on it for its simplicity and ease of use</a>. A joint study from <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.comscore.com">comScore</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.mediamind.com">MediaMind</a> (formerly Eyeblaster) gives marketers in the entertainment industry reason to look further, to measures of interaction and dwell time, for a more accurate indication of performance.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/C0FE976D-CA1F-48A4-A39F-83E282617C86/A5596D09-10F2-4BDA-A404-6CE8BA73E86D" alt="Rich Media Ad Metrics for the Entertainment Industry vs. Other Verticals Worldwide, Q1-Q4 2009" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/30/entertainment-industry-rich-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007774</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>B2B vs. B2C - Efficiency of SEO against marketing objectives</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clip Tuck</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tips - Search Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[depicts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[objectives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[primary market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[very effective seo objectives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.comVery Effective SEO Objectives by Primary MarketSee more at www.marketingsherpa.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: FCE4DC32-6C9F-459F-AE7E-12407D9D65F3 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><b>Very Effective SEO Objectives by Primary Market</b></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/FCE4DC32-6C9F-459F-AE7E-12407D9D65F3/5141C8A9-5600-45D6-8A3E-790967B7A690" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Fan Value = $136.38</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brand fans are worth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comMany social media marketers are eager to tie a hard number to the value of their efforts. To that end, firms have attempted to analyze the worth of fans and followers on social networking sites like Facebook.

Digital consulting firm Syncapse and research company Hotspex have come up with an empirical formula that puts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Many social media marketers are eager to tie a hard number to the value of their efforts. To that end, firms have attempted to analyze the worth of fans and followers on social networking sites like Facebook.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Digital consulting firm <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.syncapse.com">Syncapse</a> and research company <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hotspex.com">Hotspex</a> have come up with an empirical formula that puts an average value of $136.38 on the Facebook fans of the site&#8217;s 20 biggest corporate brands. Most of that value comes from how much the fans will spend on the brand&#8217;s products, with additional dollars coming from customer loyalty, recommendations and earned media.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A/62ED0CC2-DC57-4BF0-A78E-AF786942383F" alt="Average Value of a Facebook Fan in North America, June 2010" width="325"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The study found that people spent significantly more on products they were fans of, compared with consumers who were not fans. In the case of many of Facebook&#8217;s most popular food and beverage marketers, fan spending was more than double that of non-fans.
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A/D4829F2A-315E-485F-AB70-5F87B0B08687" alt="Select Food/Beverage Brands on Facebook, Ranked by Average Product Spending of a Facebook Fan vs. Non-Fan in North America, June 2010" width="246"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The pattern of increased fan spending held across all of the top 20 brands on Facebook, with differences ranging from 51% for Oreo fans to 168% for fans of Nokia.

</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761">Read more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>39% of Users of Cars.com Accessed Mobile Devices From Dealership Lots</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/39-of-users-of-carscom-accessed-mobile-devices-from-dealership-lots/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/39-of-users-of-carscom-accessed-mobile-devices-from-dealership-lots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[accessed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dealership]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[devices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing michael sprague]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/39-of-users-of-carscom-accessed-mobile-devices-from-dealership-lots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.com&#8220;Digital and mobile media will be a big focus this year,&#8221; he said, noting that 39% of users of Cars.com accessed mobile devices from dealership lots. &#8220;Since one in two phones today are smartphones, our biggest challenge, at least in this area, is how to communicate with consumers on mobile platforms.&#8221;Read more at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 6304AA1A-3AFE-411D-AC9A-1B483B275539 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=130516" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=130516">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=130516"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>&#8220;Digital and mobile media will be a big focus this year,&#8221; he said, noting that 39% of users of Cars.com accessed mobile devices from dealership lots. &#8220;Since one in two phones today are smartphones, our biggest challenge, at least in this area, is how to communicate with consumers on mobile platforms.&#8221;<span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=130516" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=130516">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/39-of-users-of-carscom-accessed-mobile-devices-from-dealership-lots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=130516</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rich Media Ads are Being Engaged But Not Clicked</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/rich-media-ads-are-being-engaged-but-not-clicked/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/rich-media-ads-are-being-engaged-but-not-clicked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[creative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[impressions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pieces]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[serendipity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/rich-media-ads-are-being-engaged-but-not-clicked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.imediaconnection.com Data released by MediaMind show that for every 1,000 ads, users engage in 70 rich media impressions &#8212; but only click on three. That means nearly 95 percent of impressions that users engage with are never clicked. This confirms that advertisers must bring the experience to the user, rather than have the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: DA50BA28-6001-4446-A929-01D7633ED4F3 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/26958.asp" href="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/26958.asp">www.imediaconnection.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/26958.asp"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.eyeblaster.com/Content.aspx?page=resource&amp;id=94">Data released by MediaMind</a> show that for every 1,000 ads, users engage in 70 <a rel="nofollow" href="#">rich media<img src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/1783_magglass.gif" /></a> impressions &#8212; but only click on three. That means nearly 95 percent of impressions that users engage with are never clicked. This confirms that advertisers must bring the experience to the user, rather than have the users seek it out on their own. <span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/26958.asp" href="http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/26958.asp">Read more at www.imediaconnection.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/21/rich-media-ads-are-being-engaged-but-not-clicked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/26958.asp</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.imediaconnection.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>13% of Online Users Bought Virtual Goods in Last 12 Months</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[annual survey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[magid associates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[north america]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[playspan release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.prweb.com   
                  
                    
            [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: D5400474-3985-40B3-B7F0-2DE4A194D1EC CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm" href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm">www.prweb.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table align="left" id="AutoGeneratedID-0"><tbody><tr>   <td valign="top" align="center"><table width="250px">
                  <tbody><tr>
                    <td>
                      <img src="http://www.prweb.com/images_v4/quote_left.gif" />
                        <a rel="nofollow" title="http://www.playspan.com" href="http://www.playspan.com">&#8220;There&#8217;s been a substantial increase in the number of consumers buying digital goods and an upward trend of players spending more on average than in the previous year,&#8221; said Mike Vorhaus, President, Magid Advisors.</a>
                      <img src="http://www.prweb.com/images_v4/quote_right.gif" />
                    </td>
                  </tr>
                </tbody></table></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
According to the study, 13% of the overall population surveyed reported that they had bought virtual goods in the last 12 months, with the mean of digital good purchase up 14% from $87 in 2009 to $99 in 2010. The median of digital goods purchase is $50 in 2010, a 67% improvement from $30 in 2009. In terms of the heaviest concentration of digital goods buyers, iPhone owners took over the #1 spot, moving from 28% of iPhone owners in 2009 to 43% in 2010. Virtual worlds came in second place with 41% of regular visitors having bought a digital good. Of weekly handheld and mobile gamers, 33% and 32%, respectively, bought digital goods. Overall, more than one-fifth (21%) of those who bought digital goods said they plan to spend more in the next 12 months. Among ways to purchase digital goods, 16% of digital goods buyers say they have used Facebook Credits.
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Largest demographic of consumers who have reported buying virtual goods:<br />
1. Males ages 18 to 24 (31%)<br />
2. Males ages 8 to 11 and 12 to 17 (both at 23%)<br />
3. Males 25 to 34 (21%)<br />
4. Females ages 8 to 11 (16%)<br />
5. Females ages 12 to 17 (15%)<br />
6. Females ages 18 to 24 (14%)
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Where consumers are buying from:<br />
1. In a game (57%)<br />
2. The official Web site outside the virtual world or game (38%)<br />
3. E-commerce site such as PlaySpan (16%)<br />
4. Another player (8%)<br />
5. Other (8%)<br />
6. Not sure (8%)
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Type of game or environment where consumers have bought from:<br />
1. A free, web-based game (37%)<br />
2. A social network site, other than a game (31%)<br />
3. A free multiplayer computer game (29%)<br />
4. A game on a social network site (29%)<br />
5. A connected console marketplace (21%)<br />
6. A paid, subscription based multiplayer game (18%)<br />
7. An online virtual world (11%)<br />
8. Other (6%)
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>
Concentration of virtual goods purchasers within ethnic groups:<br />
1. Asian American (26%)<br />
2. Latinos (20%)<br />
3. African American or Black (15%)<br />
4. Caucasians (11%)<br />
5. All others (12%)
</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm" href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm">Read more at www.prweb.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/13-of-online-users-bought-virtual-goods-in-last-12-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.prweb.com/releases/2010/05/prweb4059764.htm</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.prweb.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Percentage of Online Sales Attributable to Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet retailer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online sales attributable]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.com27.0% report more than 50% of their online sales are attributable to search engine marketing:           Percent of Online Sales Attributable to Search   Engine Marketing             &#160;     [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 8919A843-BD51-4BD8-9CC2-865DE8B173EF CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>27.0% report more than 50% of their online sales are attributable to search engine marketing: </p>  <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1">  <tbody><tr>   <td valign="top" colspan="6">   <p><strong>Percent of Online Sales Attributable to Search   Engine Marketing</strong></p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>&#160;</p>   </td>   <td valign="top" colspan="5">   <p align="center"><strong><em>% by Type of Retailer</em></strong></p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Percent of   Sales</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>All</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Chain</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Catalog</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Web</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>&#160;Manufacturer</em></strong></p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>5% or less</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">17.0%</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">16.7</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">27.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">16.2</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>6-10</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">25.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>11-15</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">16.7</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">10.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>16-20</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">7.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">7.4</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>21-25</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>26-30</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">36.4</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">2.9</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">22.2</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>31-40</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>41-50</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">3.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">2.9</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>&gt; 50%</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">27.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">33.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">22.2</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top" colspan="6">   <p><em>Source: Internet Retailer, May 2010</em></p>   </td>  </tr> </tbody></table>  <p>Google dominates the search engine landscape. Yahoo has been the perennial second-place finisher. Bing, has been making inroads since its launch in June 2009, and gaining increasing attention from retail marketers. 19.4% of respondents to the Internet Retailer survey say more than 90% of their search engine traffic comes from Google:</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 43.9% say 71% to 90%, </p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 25.5% report 50% to 70%</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 11.2% report less than 50%</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behavioral Targeting Proving Effective</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[behaviorally]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emarketer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[targeted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comCriticism of behaviorally targeted ads by consumers, privacy advocates and the government has led to uncertainty in the market, which eMarketer expects to reach nearly $1.13 billion this year. Research from the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) indicates the high value of those ads, for both marketers and publishers.

The study, which looked at ads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: E3FF9B57-3217-441B-9AD7-364108A6CD80 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Criticism of behaviorally targeted ads by consumers, privacy advocates and the government has led to uncertainty in the market, which eMarketer expects to reach nearly $1.13 billion this year. Research from the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.networkadvertising.org">Network Advertising Initiative (NAI)</a> indicates the high value of those ads, for both marketers and publishers.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The study, which looked at ads run on member networks during 2009, showed that among users who clicked on a behaviorally targeted ad, 6.8% converted. That compared with only 2.8% of those who clicked on a run-of-network ad. Clickers found behavioral ads more relevant, but the NAI did not study how likely they were to click in the first place, a key component of effectiveness.
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/E3FF9B57-3217-441B-9AD7-364108A6CD80/5AE6A522-0314-4384-BA88-10D2526D0725" alt="Average Conversion Rate Worldwide for Online Display Advertising on Ad Networks*, by Ad Segment, Q1-Q4 2009" width="324"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>CPM rates were likewise significantly higher for behaviorally targeted ads, with the average price of a behaviorally targeted ad 2.68 times greater than that of a run-of-network ad. Retargeting also provided higher CPMs.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/E3FF9B57-3217-441B-9AD7-364108A6CD80/F896D61B-0D96-48CF-9148-F6EE34F426AF" alt="Average CPM Worldwide for Online Display Advertising on Ad Networks*, by Ad Segment, Q1-Q4 2009" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CHART:  Advertising Tactics Trusted by Internet Users</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geographic Insights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[earned]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emarketer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comSee more at www.emarketer.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 82A4CD0C-16C7-4AD3-A11F-59D77B36806E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/82A4CD0C-16C7-4AD3-A11F-59D77B36806E/63941EF6-5AEB-4ABA-8872-2E55B7D7C821" alt="Advertising Tactics/Media Trusted* by Internet Users in North America, by Age, April 2009 (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior Marketer Top Priorities in 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social networks top priority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThe &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

Senior marketers reported that social networks and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Senior marketers reported that social networks and applications were their biggest priority for 2010, followed closely by digital infrastructure. While social media marketing looks set to stay top of mind, a majority of respondents considered a range of digital activities at least &#8220;important,&#8221; with only games failing to inspire widespread interest. 
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA/D3F72E7C-7992-402D-A96C-EBE8245A2349" alt="Top Priorities in 2010 According to Senior Marketers Worldwide (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherpa Chart: B2B Conversion to Sales Rates</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/19/sherpa-chart-b2b-conversion-to-sales-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/19/sherpa-chart-b2b-conversion-to-sales-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/19/sherpa-chart-b2b-conversion-to-sales-rates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
			SUMMARY: Marketers face lengthy time spans as they progress from lead generation to conversion, making it difficult to nurture prospects while moving them through the pipeline. This chart highlights the percentages of leads in each stage of the pipeline that are likely to advance to the next stage.      [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 32531DBF-25FA-4B47-B333-268943FF686C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="articleSummary">
			<STRONG>SUMMARY:</STRONG> Marketers face lengthy time spans as they progress from lead generation to conversion, making it difficult to nurture prospects while moving them through the pipeline. This chart highlights the percentages of leads in each stage of the pipeline that are likely to advance to the next stage.                                                     		</DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/32531DBF-25FA-4B47-B333-268943FF686C/B035E801-10AB-482C-87A9-94E88E3B69FA" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/19/sherpa-chart-b2b-conversion-to-sales-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31509</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows Online Display Increases Performance of Other Digital Efforts</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.adexchanger.comDotomi announced results from the use of its attribution technology which reiterates the impact strong attribution models can have in driving display or any digital media&#8217;s future growth. From the release: &#8220;Dotomi found display increased performance by an average of 20 percent in paid search, 26 percent in natural search, 25 percent in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 80924440-428F-4D11-8A51-EF7CC5718167 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/" href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/">www.adexchanger.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Dotomi announced results from the use of its attribution technology which reiterates the impact strong attribution models can have in driving display or any digital media&#8217;s future growth. From the release: &#8220;Dotomi found display increased performance by an average of 20 percent in paid search, 26 percent in natural search, 25 percent in affiliate marketing, 16 percent in CRM email and 26 percent in direct load, where the consumer goes directly to the retailer&#8217;s website.&#8221;  Pour on the attribution for display, and it&#8217;s full steam ahead!  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=181146">Read the release</A>.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/" href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/">Read more at www.adexchanger.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.adexchanger.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Online Retailers by Conversion Rate</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/12/02/top-ten-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-2/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/12/02/top-ten-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/12/02/top-ten-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comSee more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 3F2B1446-C887-4844-A08B-0F9129150042 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-october-2009-11211/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-october-2009-11211/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-october-2009-11211/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/3F2B1446-C887-4844-A08B-0F9129150042/D4C0F81F-ABFE-480A-810F-29230EACBE87" alt="" width="298"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-october-2009-11211/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-october-2009-11211/">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/12/02/top-ten-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/top-10-online-retailers-by-conversion-rate-october-2009-11211/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Razorfish Study: Digital Drives Brand &#38; Sales</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the entire Razorfish FEED study 2009:  http://feed.razorfish.com/Clipped from feed.razorfish.comIn our Razorfish Digital Brand Experience Study, we took a different tack. Simply, we wanted to know if there were any direct correlation between consumers&#8217; online interaction with a brand and their likelihood to purchase a given product or service. Has an experience you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>Check out the entire Razorfish FEED study 2009:  <a href="http://feed.razorfish.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://feed.razorfish.com</a>/</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: A5A9A4EF-4341-4E02-BC9F-AE42870CE04E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/" href="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/">feed.razorfish.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>In our Razorfish Digital Brand Experience Study, we took a different tack. Simply, we wanted to know if there were any direct correlation between consumers&#8217; online interaction with a brand and their likelihood to purchase a given product or service. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_81"><IMG width="280" height="147" class="size-full wp-image-81" alt="Has an experience you have had online ever changed your opinion (either positively or negatively) about a brand or the products and services it offers?" src="http://feed.razorfish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FEED09_BrandCulture_Chart-17.gif" /><P class="wp-caption-text">Has an experience you have had online ever changed your opinion (either positively or negatively) about a brand or the products and services it offers?</P></DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Furthermore, these digital brand experiences directly correlate to purchasing behavior for these consumers. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_78"><IMG width="280" height="147" class="size-full wp-image-78" alt="Has that experience influenced whether or not you purchased a product or service from the brand?" src="http://feed.razorfish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FEED09_BrandCulture_Chart-18.gif" /><P class="wp-caption-text">Has that experience influenced whether or not you purchased a product or service from the brand?</P></DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>As &#8220;digital primacy&#8221; has risen, so has the way consumers learn about and purchase a brand&#8217;s products and services. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_77"><IMG width="280" height="147" class="size-full wp-image-77" alt="Have you ever made your first purchase from a brand because of a digital experience (e.g., a web site, microsite, mobile coupon, email)?" src="http://feed.razorfish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FEED09_BrandCulture_Chart-32.gif" /><P class="wp-caption-text">Have you ever made your first purchase from a brand because of a digital experience (e.g., a web site, microsite, mobile coupon, email)?</P></DIV><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/" href="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/">Read more at feed.razorfish.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>feed.razorfish.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet a Key Component in Consumer Research on Prescriptions and Health Conditions</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/internet-a-key-component-in-consumer-research-on-prescriptions-and-health-conditions/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/internet-a-key-component-in-consumer-research-on-prescriptions-and-health-conditions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/10/17/internet-a-key-component-in-consumer-research-on-prescriptions-and-health-conditions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.comscore.com

  Incremental Effect on New Patient Starts and Adherence/Next Fill vs. ControlSource: Online Marketing Effectiveness Benchmarks for the Pharmaceutical Industry (2009 Release)
  

  &#160;
  

  Prospects
  

  Patients
  

  New Patient Starts
  

  Adherence/Next Fill
  

  Exposed &#38; Interacted (Rich [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><!--Session data--></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: DC88E54E-E48C-431D-89A5-FD2084EF39C3 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health" href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health">www.comscore.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TABLE width="355" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" border="1" class="renderedtable">
<TBODY><TR>
<TD width="474" valign="top" colspan="3">  <P><B>Incremental Effect on New Patient Starts and Adherence/Next Fill vs. Control</B></P><P><B>Source: Online Marketing Effectiveness Benchmarks for the Pharmaceutical Industry (2009 Release)</B></P>
  </TD>
</TR><TR class="bglight">
<TD width="199" valign="top" rowspan="2">  &#160;
  </TD>

<TD width="131" valign="top">  <B>Prospects</B>
  </TD>

<TD width="144" valign="top">  <B>Patients</B>
  </TD>
</TR><TR class="bgdark">
<TD width="131" valign="top">  <B>New Patient Starts</B>
  </TD>

<TD width="144" valign="top">  <B>Adherence/Next Fill</B>
  </TD>
</TR><TR class="bglight">
<TD width="199" valign="top">  Exposed &amp; Interacted (Rich Media*) 
  </TD>

<TD width="131" valign="top">  Not Reportable
  </TD>

<TD width="144" valign="top">  +14.0 % points
  </TD>
</TR><TR class="bgdark">
<TD width="199" valign="top">  Visited Brand.com
  </TD>

<TD width="131" valign="top">  +11.9 % points
  </TD>

<TD width="144" valign="top">  +24.7 % points
  </TD>
</TR>
</TBODY></TABLE></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the digital world, today released results from its third annual study <I>Online Marketing Effectiveness Benchmarks for the Pharmaceutical Industry,</I> which found that exposure to online media, including a brand&#8217;s website and online ads, had a significant positive lift on a treatment&#8217;s awareness and favorability. The results also showed that visitation to a brand&#8217;s website generated significant levels of incremental new patient starts and refills. <span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health" href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health">Read more at www.comscore.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/internet-a-key-component-in-consumer-research-on-prescriptions-and-health-conditions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/10/Study_Finds_Internet_Key_Component_in_Consumer_Research_on_Prescriptions_and_Health</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.comscore.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
