<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:amplify="http://amplify.com/xmlns/amplify"
>

<channel>
	<title>Bit Briefs  &#187; Direct Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/category/direct-response/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Trends, News and Statistics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Lead Gen Budgets Increasing</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clip Tuck</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[generation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[slashed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comBased on the quantity and quality of leads generated, companies said email was their best lead generation program, followed by live events, website registrations and webinars. The effectiveness of online channels, coupled with the fact that prospects indicate the web is the first place they look for more information, makes it natural for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1146D851-2889-4B0D-A328-07A4C758328C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-0">Based on the quantity and quality of leads generated, companies said email was their best lead generation program, followed by live events, website registrations and webinars. The effectiveness of online channels, coupled with the fact that prospects indicate the web is the first place they look for more information, makes it natural for companies to be increasing their investments in web design, email marketing and search engine optimization.

 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1146D851-2889-4B0D-A328-07A4C758328C/4E4CDD86-4B84-4025-AEC1-BE2BA53C2C0E" alt="Change* in Lead Generation Investments, 2010 (% of companies worldwide)"  width="301" height="384"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use of email marketing drivers shoppers over social media</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/26/use-of-email-marketing-drivers-shoppers-over-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/26/use-of-email-marketing-drivers-shoppers-over-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 03:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clip Tuck</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[email still driving shopping]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[messages]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[promotional]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shoppers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/26/use-of-email-marketing-drivers-shoppers-over-social-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comIn a survey of shoppers in four states, nearly four in 10 told cross-channel commerce solutions provider CrossView they preferred to receive promotional messages from retailers by email. It was the most popular communications channel, with direct mail drawing about a quarter of respondents and text messaging coming in third with 18%. Just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: FD293488-9FF4-4920-B4C3-AC80FF4D6333 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-0">In a survey of shoppers in four states, nearly four in 10 told cross-channel commerce solutions provider <a rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.crossview.com">CrossView</a> they preferred to receive promotional messages from retailers by email. It was the most popular communications channel, with direct mail drawing about a quarter of respondents and text messaging coming in third with 18%. Just 9% of shoppers were interested in promotional messages on social media.

 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/FD293488-9FF4-4920-B4C3-AC80FF4D6333/9D73E6C8-8CBA-4AE2-BCF5-CBCDE7AC6223" alt="Preferred Retail Promotion Delivery Method, Apr 2010 (% of US* in-store shoppers)"  width="324" height="240"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/26/use-of-email-marketing-drivers-shoppers-over-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007824</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Craigslist&#8217;s Unique Visitors Rise While eBay&#8217;s Drop</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/craigslists-unique-visitors-rise-while-ebays-drop/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/craigslists-unique-visitors-rise-while-ebays-drop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chart of the day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[craigslist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mark mahaney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[traffic crashes into]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/craigslists-unique-visitors-rise-while-ebays-drop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.businessinsider.comCHART OF THE DAY: Craigslist&#8217;s Traffic Crashes Into eBayCiti analyst Mark Mahaney put out a massive report on Internet stocks today, and this chart showing eBay&#8217;s tanking traffic jumped out at us. Mahaney says, &#8220;these long-term very negative traffic trends point to the possibility of sustained eBay U.S. Marketplace underperformance going forward.&#8221;See more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 8BC0AF2C-FD0F-4ED9-AF12-2F7EE6D2D866 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810">www.businessinsider.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1 id="AutoGeneratedID-0">CHART OF THE DAY: Craigslist&#8217;s Traffic Crashes Into eBay</h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1">Citi analyst Mark Mahaney put out a massive report on Internet stocks today, and this chart showing eBay&#8217;s tanking traffic jumped out at us. Mahaney says, &#8220;these long-term very negative traffic trends point to the possibility of sustained eBay U.S. Marketplace underperformance going forward.&#8221;</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/8BC0AF2C-FD0F-4ED9-AF12-2F7EE6D2D866/74CA09A7-A8CD-4EC8-9403-BC10F0BCD27E" alt="chart of the day, craigslist, amazon, ebay, 2006-2010"  width="384" height="288"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810">See more at www.businessinsider.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/craigslists-unique-visitors-rise-while-ebays-drop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-craigslist-amazon-ebay-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070810</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.businessinsider.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How People Use Their Cellphones</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/07/how-people-use-their-cellphones/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/07/how-people-use-their-cellphones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chart of the day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[most americans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/07/how-people-use-their-cellphones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.businessinsider.comCHART OF THE DAY: Here&#8217;s What People Are Actually Doing With Their CellphonesSome 34% of cellphone owners polled this year send and receive email on their mobile devices, up about one-third from 25% last year. Some 38% &#8220;access the Internet,&#8221; also up from about 25% last year.See more at www.businessinsider.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: AC43D037-FE73-4AC4-823C-0B45A0D735EC CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710">www.businessinsider.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1 id="AutoGeneratedID-0">CHART OF THE DAY: Here&#8217;s What People Are Actually Doing With Their Cellphones</h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1">Some 34% of cellphone owners polled this year send and receive email on their mobile devices, up about one-third from 25% last year. Some 38% &#8220;access the Internet,&#8221; also up from about 25% last year.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/AC43D037-FE73-4AC4-823C-0B45A0D735EC/EDAD5B34-AF70-42FC-B389-38F4BC5076E5" alt="chart of the day, cellphone usage, july 2010"  width="384" height="288"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710">See more at www.businessinsider.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/07/how-people-use-their-cellphones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-cellphone-usage-2010-7?utm_source=Triggermail&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=SAI_COTD_070710</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.businessinsider.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Fan Value = $136.38</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brand fans are worth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comMany social media marketers are eager to tie a hard number to the value of their efforts. To that end, firms have attempted to analyze the worth of fans and followers on social networking sites like Facebook.

Digital consulting firm Syncapse and research company Hotspex have come up with an empirical formula that puts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Many social media marketers are eager to tie a hard number to the value of their efforts. To that end, firms have attempted to analyze the worth of fans and followers on social networking sites like Facebook.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Digital consulting firm <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.syncapse.com">Syncapse</a> and research company <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hotspex.com">Hotspex</a> have come up with an empirical formula that puts an average value of $136.38 on the Facebook fans of the site&#8217;s 20 biggest corporate brands. Most of that value comes from how much the fans will spend on the brand&#8217;s products, with additional dollars coming from customer loyalty, recommendations and earned media.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A/62ED0CC2-DC57-4BF0-A78E-AF786942383F" alt="Average Value of a Facebook Fan in North America, June 2010" width="325"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The study found that people spent significantly more on products they were fans of, compared with consumers who were not fans. In the case of many of Facebook&#8217;s most popular food and beverage marketers, fan spending was more than double that of non-fans.
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BFC942FF-DFC0-4F14-9CD3-CF805898F85A/D4829F2A-315E-485F-AB70-5F87B0B08687" alt="Select Food/Beverage Brands on Facebook, Ranked by Average Product Spending of a Facebook Fan vs. Non-Fan in North America, June 2010" width="246"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The pattern of increased fan spending held across all of the top 20 brands on Facebook, with differences ranging from 51% for Oreo fans to 168% for fans of Nokia.

</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761">Read more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/facebook-fan-value-13638/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007761</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Channel For Lead Generation</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/02/new-channel-for-lead-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/02/new-channel-for-lead-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[developing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emerging channel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lead gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media no]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/02/new-channel-for-lead-generation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comSocial Media No. 1 Emerging Channel for Lead GenTech marketers tap social for finding new customersSocial media is developing a reputation for being valuable not just for customer interaction and brand awareness but also for lead generation. In February 2010, for example, inbound online marketing platform HubSpot found Twitter usage could double monthly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: AE51D696-FA8A-4FFA-8EAB-8FA7781C52C1 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h1><span>Social Media No. 1 Emerging Channel for Lead Gen</span></h1></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><span>Tech marketers tap social for finding new customers</span></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Social media is developing a reputation for being valuable not just for customer interaction and brand awareness but also for lead generation. In February 2010, for example, inbound online marketing platform <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.hubspot.com/">HubSpot</a> found <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007639">Twitter usage could double monthly leads</a>, and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.onesource.com/">Onesource</a> reported in January that business-to-business salespeople were <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007636">looking to LinkedIn for prospecting</a>.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/AE51D696-FA8A-4FFA-8EAB-8FA7781C52C1/0A69055A-C8F0-4EAE-B704-90A32E4EB2AC" alt="Emerging Channels for Lead Generation in 2010* According to US Technology Marketers (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/02/new-channel-for-lead-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007733</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Served 16% of All U.S. Display Ads in Q1 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/facebook-served-16-of-all-us-display-ads-in-q1-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/facebook-served-16-of-all-us-display-ads-in-q1-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[according]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beat yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[impressions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[served]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/facebook-served-16-of-all-us-display-ads-in-q1-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingpilgrim.comFacebook served 16% of all display ads in Q1 of this year, according to comScore, making it the largest online display ad publisher in the US&#8212;handily beating #2 Yahoo, reports ClickZ.Facebook&#8217;s growth is impressive whether compared to its Q4 numbers or Yahoo&#8217;s numbers. In Q1, Yahoo&#8217;s properties saw 132B impressions (12.1% of all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 3CCA4591-7564-4CC1-8506-7122D3EA7134 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html" href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html">www.marketingpilgrim.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p><img width="115" height="119" align="right" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Dollars-Floating.jpg" />Facebook served 16% of all display ads in Q1 of this year, according to comScore, making it the largest online display ad publisher in the US&#8212;handily beating #2 Yahoo, reports <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.clickz.com/3640310">ClickZ</a>.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Facebook&#8217;s growth is impressive whether compared to its Q4 numbers or Yahoo&#8217;s numbers. In Q1, Yahoo&#8217;s properties saw 132B impressions (12.1% of all online display ad impressions). In Q4, Facebook served about 115B impressions. In Q1 of this year, Facebook served a whopping 176B impressions: a 53% increase over its previous quarter. (Yahoo saw a slight decrease from Q4: down from 140B impressions, or 6%, and all other major ad players also saw declines.)</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Last year in Q1, Facebook served 70B ad impressions, which means they increased their ad impressions by over 150% YOY.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html" href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html">Read more at www.marketingpilgrim.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/01/facebook-served-16-of-all-us-display-ads-in-q1-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2010/05/facebook-served-most-display-ads-in-q1-beat-yahoo.html</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingpilgrim.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Marketing Stats for Online Retailers</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet retailer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comAccording to Internet Retailer&#8217;s recent search engine marketing survey of 102 web-only retailers, chain retailers, catalogers and consumer brand manufacturers, 28.0% of merchants report more than 25% of their site traffic stems from paid search advertisements, while 51.5% say more than a quarter of their traffic comes from natural search. Search engine marketing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 835DE139-BC86-4E77-8108-D645D8DC6606 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>According to Internet Retailer&#8217;s recent search engine marketing survey of 102 web-only retailers, chain retailers, catalogers and consumer brand manufacturers, 28.0% of merchants report more than 25% of their site traffic stems from paid search advertisements, while 51.5% say more than a quarter of their traffic comes from natural search. Search engine marketing is one of Internet retailing&#8217;s fundamentals, says the report. Web merchants keep pouring money into advertising on search results pages and on search engine optimization projects to move up in natural search results.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>In the past year:</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 44.9% of merchants report that the conversion rate on pay-per-click search advertising went up </p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 16.3% say it went down</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 38.8% say their conversion rate held steady</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 47% report more than 25% of their web sales stem from search engine marketing </p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 44.6% increased their paid search budgets</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 49% say they will increase it in the year ahead</p>  <p>Shar VanBoskirk, Vice President and principal analyst at Forrester Research, says &#8220;Everything we see from the retail side indicates&#8230; considerable interest and investment in search related to&#8230; driving more online sales.&#8221; </p>  <p>37.7% of respondents spent more than 50% of their online marketing budget, 11.9% spent 61% to 75%, and 20.8% spent more than 75%, according to the Internet Retailer survey of IRNewsLink e-newsletter readers conducted with e-mail marketing and survey firm Vovici Corp.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behavioral Targeting Proving Effective</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[behaviorally]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emarketer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[targeted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comCriticism of behaviorally targeted ads by consumers, privacy advocates and the government has led to uncertainty in the market, which eMarketer expects to reach nearly $1.13 billion this year. Research from the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) indicates the high value of those ads, for both marketers and publishers.

The study, which looked at ads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: E3FF9B57-3217-441B-9AD7-364108A6CD80 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Criticism of behaviorally targeted ads by consumers, privacy advocates and the government has led to uncertainty in the market, which eMarketer expects to reach nearly $1.13 billion this year. Research from the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.networkadvertising.org">Network Advertising Initiative (NAI)</a> indicates the high value of those ads, for both marketers and publishers.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The study, which looked at ads run on member networks during 2009, showed that among users who clicked on a behaviorally targeted ad, 6.8% converted. That compared with only 2.8% of those who clicked on a run-of-network ad. Clickers found behavioral ads more relevant, but the NAI did not study how likely they were to click in the first place, a key component of effectiveness.
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/E3FF9B57-3217-441B-9AD7-364108A6CD80/5AE6A522-0314-4384-BA88-10D2526D0725" alt="Average Conversion Rate Worldwide for Online Display Advertising on Ad Networks*, by Ad Segment, Q1-Q4 2009" width="324"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>CPM rates were likewise significantly higher for behaviorally targeted ads, with the average price of a behaviorally targeted ad 2.68 times greater than that of a run-of-network ad. Retargeting also provided higher CPMs.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/E3FF9B57-3217-441B-9AD7-364108A6CD80/F896D61B-0D96-48CF-9148-F6EE34F426AF" alt="Average CPM Worldwide for Online Display Advertising on Ad Networks*, by Ad Segment, Q1-Q4 2009" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/03/29/behavioral-targeting-proving-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007599</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>50% of Online Shoppers Use Facebook Regularly</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/17/50-of-online-shoppers-use-facebook-regularly/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/17/50-of-online-shoppers-use-facebook-regularly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[finding online shoppers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[foresee results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[shoppers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/02/17/50-of-online-shoppers-use-facebook-regularly/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comRetailers that want to connect with their target audience online would do well to go where their customers already are. And according to the &#8220;2010 Social Media Report&#8221; from ForeSee Results, 69% of online shoppers regularly use social media sites.

The overwhelming winner in terms of shopper presence was Facebook, with more than one-half [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 7EB208C8-C887-49EA-9330-F91844B82920 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Retailers that want to connect with their target audience online would do well to go where their customers already are. And according to the &#8220;2010 Social Media Report&#8221; from <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.foreseeresults.com">ForeSee Results</a>, 69% of online shoppers regularly use social media sites.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The overwhelming winner in terms of shopper presence was Facebook, with more than one-half of respondents using it regularly. YouTube took the second spot, with former giant MySpace far behind its rival. Only about one in 10 online shoppers surveyed used Twitter.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/7EB208C8-C887-49EA-9330-F91844B82920/A57D536B-67D5-4ACE-A388-B072AD65AE02" alt="Social Media Sites Used Regularly by US Online Shoppers, December 2009 (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/17/50-of-online-shoppers-use-facebook-regularly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007518</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CHART:  Advertising Tactics Trusted by Internet Users</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geographic Insights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[earned]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emarketer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comSee more at www.emarketer.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 82A4CD0C-16C7-4AD3-A11F-59D77B36806E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/82A4CD0C-16C7-4AD3-A11F-59D77B36806E/63941EF6-5AEB-4ABA-8872-2E55B7D7C821" alt="Advertising Tactics/Media Trusted* by Internet Users in North America, by Age, April 2009 (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior Marketer Top Priorities in 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social networks top priority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThe &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

Senior marketers reported that social networks and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Senior marketers reported that social networks and applications were their biggest priority for 2010, followed closely by digital infrastructure. While social media marketing looks set to stay top of mind, a majority of respondents considered a range of digital activities at least &#8220;important,&#8221; with only games failing to inspire widespread interest. 
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA/D3F72E7C-7992-402D-A96C-EBE8245A2349" alt="Top Priorities in 2010 According to Senior Marketers Worldwide (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coupons Increase Email Effectiveness</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/19/coupons-increase-email-effectiveness/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/19/coupons-increase-email-effectiveness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/19/coupons-increase-email-effectiveness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThere is a pronounced difference between open rates for e-mails that include a coupon offer and those that do not. Open rates of around 24% to 25% for coupon e-mails dropped to just 16% to 18% for noncoupon campaigns, according to Experian.
Higher open rates for coupon offers translated into higher click rates as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1A286633-C4C0-4C53-A22E-5BE411B23C70 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>There is a pronounced difference between open rates for e-mails that include a coupon offer and those that do not. Open rates of around 24% to 25% for coupon e-mails dropped to just 16% to 18% for noncoupon campaigns, according to <a rel="nofollow" target="blank" href="http://www.experian.com">Experian</A>.
</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1A286633-C4C0-4C53-A22E-5BE411B23C70/8AEB861F-EFA9-4081-9D16-42E0034E5472" alt="Open Rates for Coupon Offers vs. Other Mailings in the US, June 2008-May 2009" width="324"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Higher open rates for coupon offers translated into higher click rates as well, though the difference was much smaller. E-mails with coupons that could be used online were most likely to be clicked, at 4%.

 
</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1A286633-C4C0-4C53-A22E-5BE411B23C70/A74CAB1F-5526-436F-A838-AEB895F64319" alt="Click Rates for Coupon Offers vs. Other Mailings in the US, June 2008-May 2009" width="324"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Experian also reported that 80% of online coupon mailings saw higher transaction-to-click rates and transaction rates than noncoupon campaigns. And 78% of that group also earned higher revenues per e-mail.

</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385">Read more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/19/coupons-increase-email-effectiveness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007385</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SHERPA: How Email Marketing Budgets Changed in 2009 by Industry</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
			SUMMARY: Email has not only been spared the ax that fell heavily on most marketing budget line items, it seems to have actually benefited from the down economy. This boon wasn&#8217;t skewed by a few email-reliant sectors, it occurred in every industry participating in our benchmark survey.       [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: F4243E3F-38E8-45D5-A0AB-F9FF8CB6C0A9 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="articleSummary">
			<STRONG>SUMMARY:</STRONG> Email has not only been spared the ax that fell heavily on most marketing budget line items, it seems to have actually benefited from the down economy. This boon wasn&#8217;t skewed by a few email-reliant sectors, it occurred in every industry participating in our benchmark survey.                                                      		</DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/F4243E3F-38E8-45D5-A0AB-F9FF8CB6C0A9/7D230667-AEF3-404C-A4EC-73A809718C80" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/10/sherpa-how-email-marketing-budgets-changed-in-2009-by-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31445</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Razorfish Study: Digital Drives Brand &#38; Sales</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the entire Razorfish FEED study 2009:  http://feed.razorfish.com/Clipped from feed.razorfish.comIn our Razorfish Digital Brand Experience Study, we took a different tack. Simply, we wanted to know if there were any direct correlation between consumers&#8217; online interaction with a brand and their likelihood to purchase a given product or service. Has an experience you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>Check out the entire Razorfish FEED study 2009:  <a href="http://feed.razorfish.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://feed.razorfish.com</a>/</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: A5A9A4EF-4341-4E02-BC9F-AE42870CE04E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/" href="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/">feed.razorfish.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>In our Razorfish Digital Brand Experience Study, we took a different tack. Simply, we wanted to know if there were any direct correlation between consumers&#8217; online interaction with a brand and their likelihood to purchase a given product or service. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_81"><IMG width="280" height="147" class="size-full wp-image-81" alt="Has an experience you have had online ever changed your opinion (either positively or negatively) about a brand or the products and services it offers?" src="http://feed.razorfish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FEED09_BrandCulture_Chart-17.gif" /><P class="wp-caption-text">Has an experience you have had online ever changed your opinion (either positively or negatively) about a brand or the products and services it offers?</P></DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Furthermore, these digital brand experiences directly correlate to purchasing behavior for these consumers. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_78"><IMG width="280" height="147" class="size-full wp-image-78" alt="Has that experience influenced whether or not you purchased a product or service from the brand?" src="http://feed.razorfish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FEED09_BrandCulture_Chart-18.gif" /><P class="wp-caption-text">Has that experience influenced whether or not you purchased a product or service from the brand?</P></DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>As &#8220;digital primacy&#8221; has risen, so has the way consumers learn about and purchase a brand&#8217;s products and services. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="wp-caption alignleft" id="attachment_77"><IMG width="280" height="147" class="size-full wp-image-77" alt="Have you ever made your first purchase from a brand because of a digital experience (e.g., a web site, microsite, mobile coupon, email)?" src="http://feed.razorfish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/FEED09_BrandCulture_Chart-32.gif" /><P class="wp-caption-text">Have you ever made your first purchase from a brand because of a digital experience (e.g., a web site, microsite, mobile coupon, email)?</P></DIV><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/" href="http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/">Read more at feed.razorfish.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/09/razorfish-study-digital-drives-brand-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://feed.razorfish.com/feed09/the-bottom-line/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>feed.razorfish.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Pricing Still Down</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising Gone Wrong]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThe first half of 2009 has drops in ad spending across all media&#8212;even online&#8212;but advertisers are more optimistic about the latter part of the year, according to JPMorgan.

The company&#8217;s &#8220;Advertising Outlook 2H&#8217;09 and 2010&#8221; survey found that more than one-half of US media buyers and planners polled think second-half spending will be higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><!--Session data--></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 3334E402-8139-421C-87C9-07DD8CB6927B CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The first half of 2009 has drops in ad spending across all media&#8212;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007315">even online</A>&#8212;but advertisers are more optimistic about the latter part of the year, according to <a rel="nofollow" target="blank" href="http://www.jpmorgan.com">JPMorgan</A>.

</P><P>The company&#8217;s &#8220;Advertising Outlook 2H&#8217;09 and 2010&#8221; survey found that more than one-half of US media buyers and planners polled think second-half spending will be higher than first-half outlays. Only 10% predict spending declines.

</P><P>The majority of media buyers and planners reported they were paying less in 2009 than the previous year for ads across all media. Nine out of 10 respondents said prices had gone down for radio and outdoor, while 85% reported the same for magazines and newspapers.

 
</P><P></P><H3><IMG border="0" alt="Advertising Pricing Change in 2009* According to US Media Buyers and Planners, by Media (% of respondents)" src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/107001-108000/107397.gif" /></H3><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334">Read more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year-over-Year% Change in Online Advertising Spend by Industry</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comYear-over-Year% Change in Online Advertising Spend by Industry (U.S., August 2009)&#160;Estimated $ on Top Social Network SitesYOY% GrowthIndustryAug-08Aug-09 On Social &#160;Networks&#160;On All &#160;Sites Entertainment$1,097,700$10,012,800812%40%Travel$473,700$2,198,200364%-11%Business to Business $683,400$1,941,700184% -8%Automotive$1,110,200$3,085,800178%&#160;-26%Health$1,131,500$2,754,900 143%8%Web Media$11,231,800$26,855,700139%30%Software$526,400$1,202,500128%-29%Financial Services&#160;$3,233,900$6,415,900 98%-10%Public Services$6,836,500$13,203,10093%13%Telecommunications$12,449,500&#160;$23,550,30089%-1%Consumer Goods$1,913,400 $3,349,20075%8% Hardware &#38; Electronics$654,000 $1,022,90056%-47%Retail Goods &#38; Services$8,101,400$12,556,80055%-12%Source: Nielsen AdRelevanceRead more at www.mediapost.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><!--Session data--></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: FC4C883A-DC9C-4A07-BB50-0C4B4763BBA4 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="5"><P><STRONG>Year-over-Year% Change in Online Advertising Spend by Industry </STRONG>(U.S., August 2009)</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>&#160;</P></TD><TD valign="top" colspan="2"><P align="center"><STRONG><EM>Estimated $ on Top Social Network Sites</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top" colspan="2"><P align="center"><STRONG><EM>YOY%</EM></STRONG> Growth</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>Industry</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>Aug-08</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>Aug-09 </EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>On Social &#160;Networks</EM></STRONG></P></TD><TD valign="top"><P><STRONG><EM>&#160;On All &#160;Sites </EM></STRONG></P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Entertainment</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,097,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$10,012,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">812%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">40%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Travel</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$473,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$2,198,200</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">364%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-11%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Business to Business </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$683,400</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,941,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">184% </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-8%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Automotive</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,110,200</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$3,085,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">178%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">&#160;-26%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Health</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,131,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$2,754,900 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">143%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">8%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Web Media</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$11,231,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$26,855,700</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">139%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">30%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Software</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$526,400</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,202,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">128%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-29%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Financial Services</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">&#160;$3,233,900</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$6,415,900 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">98%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-10%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Public Services</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$6,836,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$13,203,100</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">93%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">13%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Telecommunications</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$12,449,500</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">&#160;$23,550,300</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">89%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-1%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Consumer Goods</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,913,400 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$3,349,200</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">75%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">8% </P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Hardware &amp; Electronics</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$654,000 </P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$1,022,900</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">56%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-47%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top"><P>Retail Goods &amp; Services</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$8,101,400</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">$12,556,800</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">55%</P></TD><TD valign="top"><P align="right">-12%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="5"><P><EM>Source: Nielsen AdRelevance</EM></P></TD></TR></table><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/09/year-over-year-change-in-online-advertising-spend-by-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=114784</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore and OPA Findings on Display Ads</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/28/comscore-and-opa-findings-on-display-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/28/comscore-and-opa-findings-on-display-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/28/comscore-and-opa-findings-on-display-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from blogs.imediaconnection.comThe Online Publishers Association and ComScore, both
seriously interested parties, did a study
of 80 campaigns for 50 top brands which was tracked across the top 200
highly trafficked sites and concluded:&#160;

1. The 80-20 rule applies to clicks. Eighty percent of the
clicks come from 20 percent of the people exposed to the ads. At very best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 72E66781-10D5-48F1-A76E-9F3B9CAA166A CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.imediaconnection.com/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogID=907" href="http://blogs.imediaconnection.com/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogID=907">blogs.imediaconnection.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blogs.imediaconnection.com/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogID=907"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P class="MsoNormal">The Online Publishers Association and ComScore, both
seriously interested parties, did a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://industry.bnet.com/media/10002773/opa-comscore-study-says-the-unclicked-upon-ad-has-value/">study
of 80 campaigns for 50 top brand</A>s which was tracked across the top 200
highly trafficked sites and concluded:&#160;</P>
<P class="MsoNormal"></P>
<P class="MsoNormal">1. The 80-20 rule applies to clicks. Eighty percent of the
clicks come from 20 percent of the people exposed to the ads. At very best only
1 in 5 ads draws a click whether that was the intention of the ad or not.</P>
<P class="MsoNormal">2. Displays Ads Prompt Search. Queries for terms exposed in
display ads were search 50% more often a week after exposure and 38% more often
even 4 weeks after exposure. If you see something that intersects your
interests or your personal wish list, you are more likely to search for it
directly when you&#8217;re ready to buy. Direct and brand advertising interact
synergistically online and offline.&#160;&#160;</P>
<P class="MsoNormal"></P>
<P class="MsoNormal">3. Display Ads Drive Site Engagement. Those exposed to ads
spent 34 minutes per unique visitor on the sites exposed. This is hard to
believe in terms of the time spent on site and the amount of &#8220;lift&#8221;. Maybe it
just measures the vagaries of site architecture and navigation.</P>
<P class="MsoNormal">4. Brand Exposure Bumps Up eCommerce. Those exposed to brand
ads spent 7% more on average when they bought. This feels like advertising
orthodoxy; exposure drives awareness, consideration and purchase. It&#8217;s possible
that added impressions convinces customers to trade up a little.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.imediaconnection.com/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogID=907" href="http://blogs.imediaconnection.com/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogID=907">Read more at blogs.imediaconnection.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/28/comscore-and-opa-findings-on-display-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blogs.imediaconnection.com/BlogDetail.aspx?BlogID=907</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blogs.imediaconnection.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Marketer Survey: What is Your Main Conversion Event?</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/search-marketer-survey-what-is-your-main-conversion-event/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/search-marketer-survey-what-is-your-main-conversion-event/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/15/search-marketer-survey-what-is-your-main-conversion-event/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the recent MarketingSherpa Search Benchmark Guide, May 2009Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.comRead more at www.marketingsherpa.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>From the recent MarketingSherpa Search Benchmark Guide, May 2009</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 6C3A58AD-6CF7-449D-A2F3-D0D6D4B929B3 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31352" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31352">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31352"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><BR /><P><B></B><IMG width="435" height="359" border="0" alt="View Chart Online" src="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/charts/chartofweek09_08_09.gif" /></P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31352" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31352">Read more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/search-marketer-survey-what-is-your-main-conversion-event/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31352</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Omniture Conversion Study Shows Many Marketers Missing the Mark</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/11/new-omniture-conversion-study-shows-many-marketers-missing-the-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/11/new-omniture-conversion-study-shows-many-marketers-missing-the-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising Gone Wrong]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web Usability and Landing Page Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/11/new-omniture-conversion-study-shows-many-marketers-missing-the-mark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.com 
The 2009 Omniture Online Conversion Benchmark Survey, conducted in July, reveals that most marketers miss opportunities to increase conversions. About 80% of the 1,000 online or interactive marketers responding to the survey do not serve up personalized content to Web visitors, not do they promote Web site content based on performance metrics. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 035AD77E-5BA3-437A-A2E7-5CEEEB37DBBB CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P> 
The 2009 Omniture Online Conversion Benchmark Survey, conducted in July, reveals that most marketers miss opportunities to increase conversions. About 80% of the 1,000 online or interactive marketers responding to the survey do not serve up personalized content to Web visitors, not do they promote Web site content based on performance metrics. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P> 
Forty-two percent of marketers participating in the survey spend less than five hours per week optimizing advertising media. Less than one-third frequently test online content. And 70% of the content decisions that appear on Web sites are made by one person, unsupported by data. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/035AD77E-5BA3-437A-A2E7-5CEEEB37DBBB/31DF5B13-CB56-4730-84CB-573C0CE755B6" alt="Targeting overall graph" width="384"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/035AD77E-5BA3-437A-A2E7-5CEEEB37DBBB/FB64EDF0-34FE-4DF1-A9C1-191E6D3CACB6" alt="Targeting Industry graph" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119">See more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/11/new-omniture-conversion-study-shows-many-marketers-missing-the-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=113119</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
