<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:amplify="http://amplify.com/xmlns/amplify"
>

<channel>
	<title>Bit Briefs  &#187; SEO - Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/category/seo-search-engine-optimization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Trends, News and Statistics</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Google Core Search drops to 66.2%</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/08/18/google-core-search-drops-to-662/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/08/18/google-core-search-drops-to-662/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[explicit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google leads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google sites]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[total core searches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/08/18/google-core-search-drops-to-662/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comGoogle Leads in Explicit, Total Core SearchesGoogle Slightly Loses Explicit Core Search Share
Google Sites led the US explicit core search market (which measures user engagement with a search service with the intent to retrieve search results) in July 2010 with 65.8% market share, down 0.4 percentage points from June 2010, followed by Yahoo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: E664251E-5928-4EAF-920E-85B79476E265 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h2 id="AutoGeneratedID-0"><a rel="nofollow"  rev="attachment" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/">Google Leads in Explicit, Total Core Searches</a></h2></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/E664251E-5928-4EAF-920E-85B79476E265/4A6BB664-BF6B-4ABB-8B62-450C5C19358F" alt="comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010.JPG"  width="384" height="268"/></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-2"><strong>Google Slightly Loses Explicit Core Search Share</strong><br />
Google Sites led the US explicit core search market (which measures user engagement with a search service with the intent to retrieve search results) in July 2010 with 65.8% market share, down 0.4 percentage points from June 2010, followed by Yahoo Sites with 17.1% (up 0.4 percentage points) and Microsoft sites with 11%. Ask network captured 3.8% of explicit core searches, followed by AOL LLC with 2.3%.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/08/18/google-core-search-drops-to-662/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-leads-in-explicit-total-core-searches-13913/comscore-core-search-explicit-jul-10-august-2010jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lead Gen Budgets Increasing</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clip Tuck</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[generation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[slashed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comBased on the quantity and quality of leads generated, companies said email was their best lead generation program, followed by live events, website registrations and webinars. The effectiveness of online channels, coupled with the fact that prospects indicate the web is the first place they look for more information, makes it natural for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1146D851-2889-4B0D-A328-07A4C758328C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-0">Based on the quantity and quality of leads generated, companies said email was their best lead generation program, followed by live events, website registrations and webinars. The effectiveness of online channels, coupled with the fact that prospects indicate the web is the first place they look for more information, makes it natural for companies to be increasing their investments in web design, email marketing and search engine optimization.

 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1146D851-2889-4B0D-A328-07A4C758328C/4E4CDD86-4B84-4025-AEC1-BE2BA53C2C0E" alt="Change* in Lead Generation Investments, 2010 (% of companies worldwide)"  width="301" height="384"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/28/lead-gen-budgets-increasing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007833</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misc. Search Stats for Q2 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efficient frontier]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[paid-search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sequentially]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comA flurry of paid-search reports released Tuesday may have marketers&#8217; heads spinning, but each provides insights into specific parts of the process.
SearchIgnite released the Q2 2010 U.S. Search Market Report Tuesday. Year-over-year paid-search spend increased 14% in the U.S., following an 11% YoY increase, sequentially. 
Similar to Efficient Frontier&#8217;s report, SearchIgnite found retailers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: B64743C8-A209-494A-8CA6-BC7B842730ED CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>A flurry of paid-search reports released Tuesday may have marketers&#8217; heads spinning, but each provides insights into specific parts of the process.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1">
SearchIgnite released the Q2 2010 U.S. Search Market Report Tuesday. Year-over-year paid-search spend increased 14% in the U.S., following an 11% YoY increase, sequentially. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-2">
Similar to Efficient Frontier&#8217;s report, SearchIgnite found retailers spent more &#8212; about 7% &#8212; compared with the prior year. Microsoft&#8217;s search engine Bing gained market share by 26% from the year-ago quarter, but declined 9.6% sequentially. Overall, Bing dropped slightly to 6.2% share of search spend in the U.S., while Google and Yahoo reached 78.4% and 15.4%, respectively. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-3">
Google increased the average number of paid-search ads shown per search session by 15%, followed by Yahoo at 22% and Bing at 11%. More premium ads in sponsored listings and down the right rail don&#8217;t necessarily suggest good news, however. Increasing ad coverage can diminish returns, and result in a poor experience for consumers, according to the report. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-4">
Relying on Google for metrics, the report suggests that consumers can withstand between 5.5 and 6.0 ads per search query. Yahoo now serves up 6.85, making it unlikely the increase in ads will lead to additional revenue. Bing serves up about 3.85 ads per keyword, so it&#8217;s &#8220;extremely&#8221; likely that this will reflect in better-than-expected revenues for the search engine. Similarly, Google went from 4.97 to 5.72, so they could report healthy increases as well. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td> Google now monetizes nearly 8% more of their keyword searches. Stokes says keywords searched with no ads decreased from 43.6% in Q1 to 39.7% in June, making the inventory easier to monetize. </td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-6">
In the Americas, paid-search spending by tech companies increased 12% during the second quarter, while the Asia/Pacific region rose 33%, sequentially. Combined, spending in Europe, the Middle East and Africa grew 25%. Google&#8217;s China strategy and move to serve content from Hong Kong has influenced performance. During the second quarter, Google&#8217;s share in the region dropped from 69% to 61%, while Baidu&#8217;s share of paid-search spending rose to 22% from 12%, sequentially. </p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=131916&#038;nid=116606">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/misc-search-stats-for-q2-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=131916&amp;nid=116606</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google ACSI Score Drops</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/google-acsi-score-drops/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/google-acsi-score-drops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aol gains]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[customer satisfaction]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google slips]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[repository]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/google-acsi-score-drops/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comGoogle Slips, AOL Gains in Customer SatisfactionSee more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 0A060FBA-42E3-4114-BF7A-C131CD6C47CD CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h2 id="AutoGeneratedID-0"><a rel="nofollow"  rev="attachment" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/">Google Slips, AOL Gains in Customer Satisfaction</a></h2></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/0A060FBA-42E3-4114-BF7A-C131CD6C47CD/C31B9E88-73D6-4BA9-803B-626E51F19D68" alt="foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010.JPG"  width="384" height="169"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/27/google-acsi-score-drops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/google-slips-aol-gains-in-customer-satisfaction-13646/foresee-portals-search-engines-july-2010jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Makes up 62.6% of Searches</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/14/google-makes-up-626-of-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/14/google-makes-up-626-of-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google sites]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[microsoft sites]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[percentage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[points]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/14/google-makes-up-626-of-searches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comYahoo, Microsoft Make Slight Gains
Google Sites led the US core search market in June with 62.6% of the searches conducted (down 1.1 percentage points from May), followed by Yahoo Sites (up 0.6 percentage points to 18.9%), and Microsoft Sites (up 0.6 percentage points to 12.7%).See more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: C2FA01F9-D72B-4EAD-B0F2-94F4E6351DF0 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1"><strong id="AutoGeneratedID-0">Yahoo, Microsoft Make Slight Gains</strong><br />
Google Sites led the US core search market in June with 62.6% of the searches conducted (down 1.1 percentage points from May), followed by Yahoo Sites (up 0.6 percentage points to 18.9%), and Microsoft Sites (up 0.6 percentage points to 12.7%).</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/C2FA01F9-D72B-4EAD-B0F2-94F4E6351DF0/C70B7E2E-F516-43D4-B52E-BAD7993E3B91" alt="comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010.jpg"  width="384" height="331"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/14/google-makes-up-626-of-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/direct/core-searches-grow-3-again-13528/comscore-search-core-search-jun-10-july-2010jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Search</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/13/the-future-of-search/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/13/the-future-of-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[expected future impact]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[impact]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[innovations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new chart]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/13/the-future-of-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
		
		New Chart: The Expected Future Impact of Search Innovations		
	
			SUMMARY: Recent search engine innovations have changed the SEO landscape as we know it. What impact will personalized, real time, mobile and video search have on an organization&#8217;s SEO campaigns in the next 1&#8211;5 years? 

In this week&#8217;s chart, you&#8217;ll learn which innovations are expected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1F25DCDF-CD70-405D-896F-723289C0E388 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h3 id="AutoGeneratedID-0">
		<a rel="nofollow"  href="#">
		New Chart: The Expected Future Impact of Search Innovations		</a>
	</h3></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><table><tr><td width="300px" id="AutoGeneratedID-1">
			<strong>SUMMARY:</strong> Recent search engine innovations have changed the SEO landscape as we know it. What impact will personalized, real time, mobile and video search have on an organization&#8217;s SEO campaigns in the next 1&#8211;5 years? 
<br />
<br />In this week&#8217;s chart, you&#8217;ll learn which innovations are expected to have the greatest impact.                                                   			</td></tr></table></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1F25DCDF-CD70-405D-896F-723289C0E388/AC97C019-5669-4268-A930-418E753082C9" alt="View Chart Online"  width="384" height="328"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/13/the-future-of-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31665</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Budget Allocation</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/06/seo-budget-allocation/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/06/seo-budget-allocation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[budgets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[expenses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[medium]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new chart]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/06/seo-budget-allocation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
		
		New Chart: The Allocation of SEO Budgets		
	
			SUMMARY: How are small, medium and large organizations allocating SEO budgets differently? In this week&#8217;s chart, you&#8217;ll learn what portion of SEO budgets various SEO expenses are taking for small, medium and large organizations, in regards to staff salaries, agency expenses, analytics programs and purchasing inbound links. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 195757AB-C9C1-48A0-8CDC-33BEAB65619E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h3 id="AutoGeneratedID-0">
		<a rel="nofollow"  href="#">
		New Chart: The Allocation of SEO Budgets		</a>
	</h3></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div id="AutoGeneratedID-1">
			<strong>SUMMARY:</strong> How are small, medium and large organizations allocating SEO budgets differently? In this week&#8217;s chart, you&#8217;ll learn what portion of SEO budgets various SEO expenses are taking for small, medium and large organizations, in regards to staff salaries, agency expenses, analytics programs and purchasing inbound links.                                                      		</div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/195757AB-C9C1-48A0-8CDC-33BEAB65619E/FF3D6D31-C93C-4BCD-8435-DFB5A200E403" alt="View Chart Online"  width="384" height="317"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/06/seo-budget-allocation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31659</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/02/top-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/02/top-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cliptastic</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tips - Search Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2010top]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketingcharts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[publisher]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[top search engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[visits april]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/02/top-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comTop Search Engines by Share of Visits April vs. May 2010See more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 83B7E1A4-39DF-4E25-AA7F-3006856D8C58 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&#038;utm_source=mc&#038;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&#038;utm_source=mc&#038;utm_medium=textlink">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&#038;utm_source=mc&#038;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><h2 id="AutoGeneratedID-0">Top Search Engines by Share of Visits April vs. May 2010</h2></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&#038;utm_source=mc&#038;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/83B7E1A4-39DF-4E25-AA7F-3006856D8C58/E535608A-40FF-4FE1-BA1C-C5065CE0DA4C" alt=""  width="384" height="337"/></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&#038;utm_source=mc&#038;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&#038;utm_source=mc&#038;utm_medium=textlink">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/02/top-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/top-search-engines-by-share-of-visits-april-vs-may-2010-13430/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>B2B vs. B2C - Efficiency of SEO against marketing objectives</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clip Tuck</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tips - Search Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[depicts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[objectives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[primary market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[very effective seo objectives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.comVery Effective SEO Objectives by Primary MarketSee more at www.marketingsherpa.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: FCE4DC32-6C9F-459F-AE7E-12407D9D65F3 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><b>Very Effective SEO Objectives by Primary Market</b></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/FCE4DC32-6C9F-459F-AE7E-12407D9D65F3/5141C8A9-5600-45D6-8A3E-790967B7A690" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/06/29/b2b-vs-b2c-efficiency-of-seo-against-marketing-objectives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31654</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Percentage of Online Sales Attributable to Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet retailer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[online sales attributable]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.com27.0% report more than 50% of their online sales are attributable to search engine marketing:           Percent of Online Sales Attributable to Search   Engine Marketing             &#160;     [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 8919A843-BD51-4BD8-9CC2-865DE8B173EF CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>27.0% report more than 50% of their online sales are attributable to search engine marketing: </p>  <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1">  <tbody><tr>   <td valign="top" colspan="6">   <p><strong>Percent of Online Sales Attributable to Search   Engine Marketing</strong></p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>&#160;</p>   </td>   <td valign="top" colspan="5">   <p align="center"><strong><em>% by Type of Retailer</em></strong></p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Percent of   Sales</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>All</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Chain</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Catalog</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>Web</em></strong></p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p><strong><em>&#160;Manufacturer</em></strong></p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>5% or less</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">17.0%</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">16.7</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">27.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">16.2</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>6-10</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">25.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>11-15</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">16.7</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">10.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>16-20</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">7.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">7.4</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>21-25</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>26-30</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">36.4</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">2.9</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">22.2</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>31-40</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">11.1</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>41-50</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">3.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">2.9</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">0.0</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top">   <p>&gt; 50%</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">27.0</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">8.3</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">9.1</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">33.8</p>   </td>   <td valign="top">   <p align="right">22.2</p>   </td>  </tr>  <tr>   <td valign="top" colspan="6">   <p><em>Source: Internet Retailer, May 2010</em></p>   </td>  </tr> </tbody></table>  <p>Google dominates the search engine landscape. Yahoo has been the perennial second-place finisher. Bing, has been making inroads since its launch in June 2009, and gaining increasing attention from retail marketers. 19.4% of respondents to the Internet Retailer survey say more than 90% of their search engine traffic comes from Google:</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 43.9% say 71% to 90%, </p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 25.5% report 50% to 70%</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 11.2% report less than 50%</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/percentage-of-online-sales-attributable-to-search-engine-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Marketing Stats for Online Retailers</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[internet retailer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comAccording to Internet Retailer&#8217;s recent search engine marketing survey of 102 web-only retailers, chain retailers, catalogers and consumer brand manufacturers, 28.0% of merchants report more than 25% of their site traffic stems from paid search advertisements, while 51.5% say more than a quarter of their traffic comes from natural search. Search engine marketing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 835DE139-BC86-4E77-8108-D645D8DC6606 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>According to Internet Retailer&#8217;s recent search engine marketing survey of 102 web-only retailers, chain retailers, catalogers and consumer brand manufacturers, 28.0% of merchants report more than 25% of their site traffic stems from paid search advertisements, while 51.5% say more than a quarter of their traffic comes from natural search. Search engine marketing is one of Internet retailing&#8217;s fundamentals, says the report. Web merchants keep pouring money into advertising on search results pages and on search engine optimization projects to move up in natural search results.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>In the past year:</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 44.9% of merchants report that the conversion rate on pay-per-click search advertising went up </p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 16.3% say it went down</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 38.8% say their conversion rate held steady</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 47% report more than 25% of their web sales stem from search engine marketing </p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 44.6% increased their paid search budgets</p>  <p>&#183;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; 49% say they will increase it in the year ahead</p>  <p>Shar VanBoskirk, Vice President and principal analyst at Forrester Research, says &#8220;Everything we see from the retail side indicates&#8230; considerable interest and investment in search related to&#8230; driving more online sales.&#8221; </p>  <p>37.7% of respondents spent more than 50% of their online marketing budget, 11.9% spent 61% to 75%, and 20.8% spent more than 75%, according to the Internet Retailer survey of IRNewsLink e-newsletter readers conducted with e-mail marketing and survey firm Vovici Corp.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/05/24/search-marketing-stats-for-online-retailers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=128300</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CHART:  Advertising Tactics Trusted by Internet Users</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geographic Insights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brands]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[earned]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[emarketer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comSee more at www.emarketer.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 82A4CD0C-16C7-4AD3-A11F-59D77B36806E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/82A4CD0C-16C7-4AD3-A11F-59D77B36806E/63941EF6-5AEB-4ABA-8872-2E55B7D7C821" alt="Advertising Tactics/Media Trusted* by Internet Users in North America, by Age, April 2009 (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/02/11/chart-advertising-tactics-trusted-by-internet-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007510</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior Marketer Top Priorities in 2010</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buzz Monitoring &amp; Reputation Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital marketing outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social networks top priority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThe &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

Senior marketers reported that social networks and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The &#8220;2010 Digital Marketing Outlook&#8221; report found that 81% of the brand executives surveyed expected an increase in digital projects in 2010, and one-half will be moving dollars from traditional to digital budgets. Further, more than three-quarters think the current economy will push more allocations to digital.

</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Senior marketers reported that social networks and applications were their biggest priority for 2010, followed closely by digital infrastructure. While social media marketing looks set to stay top of mind, a majority of respondents considered a range of digital activities at least &#8220;important,&#8221; with only games failing to inspire widespread interest. 
 
</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/963A5C25-C340-46A0-88DA-1DB96F4B50EA/D3F72E7C-7992-402D-A96C-EBE8245A2349" alt="Top Priorities in 2010 According to Senior Marketers Worldwide (% of respondents)" width="324"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479">See more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/27/senior-marketer-top-priorities-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007479</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sponsored Forum Posts Effective at Increasing Click-throughs</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/21/sponsored-forum-posts-effective-at-increasing-click-throughs/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/21/sponsored-forum-posts-effective-at-increasing-click-throughs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[click-throughs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[days]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[increase]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sponsored]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/21/sponsored-forum-posts-effective-at-increasing-click-throughs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of effectiveness, do you think sponsored forum posts &#8220;hijack&#8221; the thread&#8217;s integrity?  Or is this a legitimate form of online advertising?Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comSponsored posts that appear in targeted online forums, clearly marked as advertisements, appear to actually increase in their ability to drive response over time - by more than 100% one year [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>Regardless of effectiveness, do you think sponsored forum posts &#8220;hijack&#8221; the thread&#8217;s integrity?  Or is this a legitimate form of online advertising?</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1CFF8C40-4CCB-4788-9480-80BB6F20F966 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>Sponsored posts that appear in targeted online forums, clearly marked as advertisements, appear to actually increase in their ability to drive response over time - by more than 100% one year after a paid campaign has ended, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20100120005612&amp;newsLang=en">according to</a> a recent analysis released by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.postrelease.com">PostRelease</a>. </p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p>The study also showed that 60 days after a typical sponsored forum post&#8217;s appearance, the total number of click-throughs increase by an average of 40%. After 180 days they increase by an average of 77%.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/1CFF8C40-4CCB-4788-9480-80BB6F20F966/B338076D-2600-4652-A671-EA76B4A21604" alt="postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010.jpg" width="384"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><ul>
<li>After 60 days the reads increased 28.8%</li>
<li>After 60 days the click-throughs increased 40.7%</li>
<li>     After 180 days the reads increased 49.2%</li>
<li>After 180 days the click-throughs increased 77.1%</li>
<li>After 360 days the reads increased 60.6%</li>
<li>After 360 days the click-throughs increased 103.6%</li>
</ul><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/21/sponsored-forum-posts-effective-at-increasing-click-throughs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/sponsored-forum-posts-increase-response-by-more-than-100-11696/postrelease-residual-traffic-sponsored-forum-posts-january-2010jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows Online Display Increases Performance of Other Digital Efforts</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.adexchanger.comDotomi announced results from the use of its attribution technology which reiterates the impact strong attribution models can have in driving display or any digital media&#8217;s future growth. From the release: &#8220;Dotomi found display increased performance by an average of 20 percent in paid search, 26 percent in natural search, 25 percent in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 80924440-428F-4D11-8A51-EF7CC5718167 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/" href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/">www.adexchanger.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Dotomi announced results from the use of its attribution technology which reiterates the impact strong attribution models can have in driving display or any digital media&#8217;s future growth. From the release: &#8220;Dotomi found display increased performance by an average of 20 percent in paid search, 26 percent in natural search, 25 percent in affiliate marketing, 16 percent in CRM email and 26 percent in direct load, where the consumer goes directly to the retailer&#8217;s website.&#8221;  Pour on the attribution for display, and it&#8217;s full steam ahead!  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=181146">Read the release</A>.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/" href="http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/">Read more at www.adexchanger.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/06/study-shows-online-display-increases-performance-of-other-digital-efforts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.adexchanger.com/ad-exchange-news/dotomi-displays-attribution-ad-holiding-company/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.adexchanger.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherpa Chart: How Merchants Manage the Affiliate Search Marketing Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/24/sherpa-chart-how-merchants-manage-the-affiliate-search-marketing-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/24/sherpa-chart-how-merchants-manage-the-affiliate-search-marketing-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tips - Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/24/sherpa-chart-how-merchants-manage-the-affiliate-search-marketing-dilemma/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
			SUMMARY: Competition between companies and their affiliates is natural. Affiliates can be very effective at creating revenue-generating traffic through search so there&#8217;s an inherent tension in the system. See the main attitudes/policies with which merchants attempt to deal with this issue.             [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 954EA45E-1BCA-47A5-B279-A309ADD43794 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="articleSummary">
			<STRONG>SUMMARY:</STRONG> Competition between companies and their affiliates is natural. Affiliates can be very effective at creating revenue-generating traffic through search so there&#8217;s an inherent tension in the system. See the main attitudes/policies with which merchants attempt to deal with this issue.                                                            		</DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/954EA45E-1BCA-47A5-B279-A309ADD43794/E77EF2CB-3C5C-45D6-BA86-3A964AEC8026" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/24/sherpa-chart-how-merchants-manage-the-affiliate-search-marketing-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31455</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherpa Chart: How Agencies View Client Search Marketing Budgets</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/18/sherpa-chart-how-agencies-view-client-search-marketing-budgets/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/18/sherpa-chart-how-agencies-view-client-search-marketing-budgets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/18/sherpa-chart-how-agencies-view-client-search-marketing-budgets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
			SUMMARY: Today, many marketers have been forced to make sacrifices to accommodate smaller budgets. This decrease in elastic budgets has caused many companies to run out of available money when they need it most, reducing their ability to meet consumer demand for their keywords.          [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: A7181950-3445-4258-A3D4-090C9301B136 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="articleSummary">
			<STRONG>SUMMARY:</STRONG> Today, many marketers have been forced to make sacrifices to accommodate smaller budgets. This decrease in elastic budgets has caused many companies to run out of available money when they need it most, reducing their ability to meet consumer demand for their keywords.                                                         		</DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><B>The Elasticity of Client Search Budgets</B></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/A7181950-3445-4258-A3D4-090C9301B136/FE84C8CD-7340-44B1-8D57-E3C6423B0770" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/18/sherpa-chart-how-agencies-view-client-search-marketing-budgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31450</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Pricing Still Down</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Advertising Gone Wrong]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.emarketer.comThe first half of 2009 has drops in ad spending across all media&#8212;even online&#8212;but advertisers are more optimistic about the latter part of the year, according to JPMorgan.

The company&#8217;s &#8220;Advertising Outlook 2H&#8217;09 and 2010&#8221; survey found that more than one-half of US media buyers and planners polled think second-half spending will be higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><!--Session data--></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 3334E402-8139-421C-87C9-07DD8CB6927B CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334">www.emarketer.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The first half of 2009 has drops in ad spending across all media&#8212;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007315">even online</A>&#8212;but advertisers are more optimistic about the latter part of the year, according to <a rel="nofollow" target="blank" href="http://www.jpmorgan.com">JPMorgan</A>.

</P><P>The company&#8217;s &#8220;Advertising Outlook 2H&#8217;09 and 2010&#8221; survey found that more than one-half of US media buyers and planners polled think second-half spending will be higher than first-half outlays. Only 10% predict spending declines.

</P><P>The majority of media buyers and planners reported they were paying less in 2009 than the previous year for ads across all media. Nine out of 10 respondents said prices had gone down for radio and outdoor, while 85% reported the same for magazines and newspapers.

 
</P><P></P><H3><IMG border="0" alt="Advertising Pricing Change in 2009* According to US Media Buyers and Planners, by Media (% of respondents)" src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/107001-108000/107397.gif" /></H3><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334" href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334">Read more at www.emarketer.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/17/ad-pricing-still-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007334</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.emarketer.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherpa Survey: Is Analytics Mandatory for Search?</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/13/sherpa-survey-is-analytics-mandatory-for-search/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/13/sherpa-survey-is-analytics-mandatory-for-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/10/13/sherpa-survey-is-analytics-mandatory-for-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.com
			SUMMARY: Just as the web democratized media access to a mass audience for any advertiser-free or cheap methods for measuring search media have also now become available to anyone. 

Search marketing has always been a numbers-intensive endeavor, so it&#8217;s no surprise that search marketers have quickly adopted analytics into everyday use.   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><!--Session data--></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: BF412F34-1ACD-4D1C-B04C-E015580FDC1B CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV class="articleSummary"><DIV>
			<STRONG>SUMMARY:</STRONG> Just as the web democratized media access to a mass audience for any advertiser-free or cheap methods for measuring search media have also now become available to anyone. 
</DIV>
<BR />Search marketing has always been a numbers-intensive endeavor, so it&#8217;s no surprise that search marketers have quickly adopted analytics into everyday use.                                                  		</DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content7.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/BF412F34-1ACD-4D1C-B04C-E015580FDC1B/C0180F23-8E5E-4376-AAC7-36EF04FFAABD" alt="View Chart Online" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390">See more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/10/13/sherpa-survey-is-analytics-mandatory-for-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31390</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>113 Billion Searches Worldwide in July 09</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/01/113-billion-searches-worldwide-in-july-09/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/01/113-billion-searches-worldwide-in-july-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/01/113-billion-searches-worldwide-in-july-09/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.com More than 113 billion searches were conducted in July worldwide, representing a 41% increase year-over-year, according to new data from comScore. 
Google was responsible for the vast majority of search activity, with 76.7 billion searches conducted in July, which represented a 67.5% market share. 
Yahoo ranked second worldwide with 8.9 billion searches, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 5E66FB5A-033E-47C3-AC26-A75F1A877F04 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td> More than 113 billion searches were conducted in July worldwide, representing a 41% increase year-over-year, according to new data from comScore. <P>
Google was responsible for the vast majority of search activity, with 76.7 billion searches conducted in July, which represented a 67.5% market share. </P><P>
Yahoo ranked second worldwide with 8.9 billion searches, or a 7.8% share &#8212; followed closely by Chinese search engine Baidu with 8 billion searches, or a 7% share. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Globally, Europe accounts for the most searches, but Latin America is highest in searches per searcher. </P><P>
The dynamics of search behavior vary considerably across different parts of the world. Among the five global regions, Europe accounted for the highest share of searches at 32.1%, followed by Asia-Pacific &#8212; 30.8% &#8212; and North America &#8212; 22.1%. </P><P>
Notably, Latin America exhibited the heaviest search behavior per person with an average of 13 search usage days in July and 130 searches per searcher. Europe had the second-highest overall search volume per person &#8212; 117 searches per searcher &#8212; while North America exhibited the second-heaviest frequency &#8212; 12.5 search usage days per searcher. </P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/01/113-billion-searches-worldwide-in-july-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=112715</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
