<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:amplify="http://amplify.com/xmlns/amplify"
>

<channel>
	<title>Bit Briefs  &#187; Traditional Marketing Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/category/traditional-marketing-media/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com</link>
	<description>Marketing Trends, News and Statistics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Television and Online Combined Found Two Times More Effective Than Television Alone</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/23/television-and-online-combined-found-two-times-more-effective-than-television-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/23/television-and-online-combined-found-two-times-more-effective-than-television-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Clip</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nielsen company]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nielsen media research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nielsen mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nielsen online]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[press releases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/23/television-and-online-combined-found-two-times-more-effective-than-television-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from blog.nielsen.comTwo Screens are Better than One
Turns out two media are better than one in moving consumers from awareness to action. In a Nielsen&#160; study of direct-to-consumer drug advertising, exposure on TV and online was more than twice as likely to prompt patients to ask their physician about the drug than Internet alone.The study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 52D3A7B8-CEC3-4735-A353-E247BE194098 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/">blog.nielsen.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-1"><strong id="AutoGeneratedID-0">Two Screens are Better than One</strong><br />
Turns out two media are better than one in moving consumers from awareness to action. In a Nielsen&#160; study of direct-to-consumer drug advertising, exposure on TV and online was more than twice as likely to prompt patients to ask their physician about the drug than Internet alone.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/52D3A7B8-CEC3-4735-A353-E247BE194098/34FA1544-3325-462B-B411-F79BBDDF4F4C" alt="Cross-media-fusion"  width="384" height="276"/></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-3">The study also found that premium in-stream video ads which aired as part of a full-length TV episode online generated significantly higher levels of ad recall and brand recognition than other Internet video, display or standard TV ads.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/">Read more at blog.nielsen.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/23/television-and-online-combined-found-two-times-more-effective-than-television-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blog.nielsen.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV Combined with Online Provides Greater Influence Over TV Alone - Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/tv-combined-with-online-provides-greater-influence-over-tv-alone-nielsen/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/tv-combined-with-online-provides-greater-influence-over-tv-alone-nielsen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Clip</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nielsen media research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nielsen online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/tv-combined-with-online-provides-greater-influence-over-tv-alone-nielsen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from blog.nielsen.comTwo Screens are Better than One
Turns out two media are better than one in moving consumers from awareness to action. In a Nielsen&#160; study of direct-to-consumer drug advertising, exposure on TV and online was more than twice as likely to prompt patients to ask their physician about the drug than TV alone.The study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 700B6F52-7E17-40FC-8820-C0E14A4C79DB CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/">blog.nielsen.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/700B6F52-7E17-40FC-8820-C0E14A4C79DB/EC414BD7-AAE2-4210-8CE1-1BAB22FB7743" alt="Cross-media-fusion"  width="384" height="276"/></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-2"><strong id="AutoGeneratedID-1">Two Screens are Better than One</strong><br />
Turns out two media are better than one in moving consumers from awareness to action. In a Nielsen&#160; study of direct-to-consumer drug advertising, exposure on TV and online was more than twice as likely to prompt patients to ask their physician about the drug than TV alone.</p></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><p id="AutoGeneratedID-3">The study also found that premium in-stream video ads which aired as part of a full-length TV episode online generated significantly higher levels of ad recall and brand recognition than other Internet video, display or standard TV ads.</p><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/" href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/">Read more at blog.nielsen.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/07/08/tv-combined-with-online-provides-greater-influence-over-tv-alone-nielsen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/data-integration-optimizes-advertising-media-mix/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>blog.nielsen.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forrester:  80% of Americans Would Abandon News Websites If They Charged</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/13/forrester-80-of-americans-would-abandon-news-websites-if-they-charged/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/13/forrester-80-of-americans-would-abandon-news-websites-if-they-charged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2010/01/13/forrester-80-of-americans-would-abandon-news-websites-if-they-charged/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[def of &#8220;paywall&#8221; - A feature of a website that only allows access to certain pages or data to paid up subscribersClipped from www.economist.comWill these paywalls, however carefully crafted, persuade people to pay for something they are used to getting free? A barrage of surveys suggests it will be difficult. A poll by Harris Interactive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>def of &#8220;paywall&#8221; - A feature of a website that only allows access to certain pages or data to paid up subscribers</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 1B0893AC-99E7-483A-8C8C-2C038E31122F CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15207305" href="http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15207305">www.economist.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15207305"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Will these paywalls, however carefully crafted, persuade people to pay for something they are used to getting free? A barrage of surveys suggests it will be difficult. A <a rel="nofollow" title=" (opens in a new window) " href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-pcukharris-poll-the-whole-piece-in-links/" target="_blank">poll</A> by Harris Interactive for <a rel="nofollow" title=" (opens in a new window) " href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/" target="_blank">paidContent:UK</A>, a website owned the <EM>Guardian</EM>, finds that three-quarters of Britons say they would switch to an alternative free news source if their favourite website began charging. In November 2009 <a rel="nofollow" title=" (opens in a new window) " href="http://www.forrester.com" target="_blank">Forrester</A>, a consultancy, found that 80% of Americans would abandon news websites if they charged. Plenty of news outlets, from the BBC to CNN, seem likely to continue providing free online news, and there will be plenty of aggregator websites to sift their offerings. </P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15207305" href="http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15207305">Read more at www.economist.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2010/01/13/forrester-80-of-americans-would-abandon-news-websites-if-they-charged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15207305</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.economist.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspaper Revenue Down 28%, Online Down 17%</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/23/newspaper-revenue-down-28-online-down-17/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/23/newspaper-revenue-down-28-online-down-17/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/11/23/newspaper-revenue-down-28-online-down-17/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comTotal newspaper advertising revenue dove 28% in Q309 compared with the same quarter in 2008, falling from $10.1 billion to about $6.4 billion, according to the most recent figures released by the Newspaper Association of America (NAA). Print was not the only area to see revenue plunge, according to the data.&#160; Online revenues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: F1F81933-96D4-4524-84B4-2707B4325A8B CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Total newspaper advertising revenue dove 28% in Q309 compared with the same quarter in 2008, falling from $10.1 billion to about $6.4 billion, according to the most recent figures <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.naa.org/TrendsandNumbers/Advertising-Expenditures.aspx">released by</A> the Newspaper Association of America (<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.naa.org">NAA</A>). <SPAN></SPAN></P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Print was not the only area to see revenue plunge, according to the data.&#160; Online revenues fell 17%, from $750 million in the same quarter last year to $623 million this year.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/11/23/newspaper-revenue-down-28-online-down-17/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/newspaper-revenue-dives-28-in-q3-online-falls-17-11151/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Consumption &#38; Perceived Credibility</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/24/media-consumption-perceived-credibility/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/24/media-consumption-perceived-credibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/24/media-consumption-perceived-credibility/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.com
 Television: 31.1% (down from 34.7% a year ago)
 Daily newspaper: 19.4% (down from 23.5%)
 Radio: 19.4% (up from 16.5%)
 Online: 14.6% (up from 12.7%)
 Weekly community papers: 4.4% (down from 5.1 %)
 Free shopper newspapers: 2.9% (up from 2.2%)
 Magazines: 2.1% (up from 1.6%)
Other survey findings: College grads are more likely to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 05E8DA5E-C265-405D-B67E-CE386049AB5F CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/05E8DA5E-C265-405D-B67E-CE386049AB5F/7A345EE3-3466-47B8-A81B-605AA3C505AE" alt="aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009.jpg" width="384"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><UL>
<LI> Television: 31.1% (down from 34.7% a year ago)</LI>
<LI> Daily newspaper: 19.4% (down from 23.5%)</LI>
<LI> Radio: 19.4% (up from 16.5%)</LI>
<LI> Online: 14.6% (up from 12.7%)</LI>
<LI> Weekly community papers: 4.4% (down from 5.1 %)</LI>
<LI> Free shopper newspapers: 2.9% (up from 2.2%)</LI>
<LI> Magazines: 2.1% (up from 1.6%)</LI>
</UL></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Other survey findings:</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI> College grads are more likely to trust online news (giving online a 6.3 rating vs. the 5.7 rating by the general population), and are less likely to trust TV news (giving TV a 6.1 rating vs. the 6.5 rating by the general population).</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI> Respondents with annual household incomes of $100K and above trust online sources considerably more than the general population (giving online a 6.5 rating, compared with the 5.7 rating by the general population).</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>Higher-income respondents also view daily newspapers as more credible (6.8 vs. the 6.3 overall rating).</LI><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/24/media-consumption-perceived-credibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/media-usage-study-online-tv-still-most-credible-10516/aranet-orc-media-consumption-percentage-news-consumers-receive-media-september-2009jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>24% of Newspapers Severely Behind the Times</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/24-of-newspapers-severely-behind-the-times/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/24-of-newspapers-severely-behind-the-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/15/24-of-newspapers-severely-behind-the-times/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.businessinsider.comThe American Press Institute asked 2,400 newspaper executives if their papers &#8220;provide access to stories or information such as sports scores, headlines, stock quotes, etc.,&#8221; via Twitter, Facebook, Email alerts, Mobile/PDA, YouTube, Kindle, Flickr, e-readers, etc., and told them to &#8220;check all that apply.&#8221;
As the chart below shows, a whopping 24% of all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 3105DC24-07F9-4189-A6A7-2C132A5C417A CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9">www.businessinsider.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The American Press Institute <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/09/lots-of-data-to-mull-on-charging-for-online-content/">asked</A> 2,400 newspaper executives if their papers &#8220;provide access to stories or information such as sports scores, headlines, stock quotes, etc.,&#8221; via Twitter, Facebook, Email alerts, Mobile/PDA, YouTube, Kindle, Flickr, e-readers, etc., and told them to &#8220;check all that apply.&#8221;</P>
<P>As the chart below shows, a whopping 24% of all respondents answered &#8220;None at this time.&#8221; Bizarre.</P>
</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/3105DC24-07F9-4189-A6A7-2C132A5C417A/6F64FC78-2126-4EC4-8D0C-F8EA0DB9614A" alt="sai091509-news-distribution-platforms.gif" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9" href="http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9">See more at www.businessinsider.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/15/24-of-newspapers-severely-behind-the-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-news-distribution-2009-9</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.businessinsider.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Agree or Disagree That Social Media Will&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/01/do-you-agree-or-disagree-that-social-media-will/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/01/do-you-agree-or-disagree-that-social-media-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/09/01/do-you-agree-or-disagree-that-social-media-will/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingsherpa.comDo You Agree or Disagree That Social Media WillRead more at www.marketingsherpa.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: CECF36A9-DCE6-42ED-B211-1D74008A397F CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31346" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31346">www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31346"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P><B>Do You Agree or Disagree That Social Media Will<BR /></B></P><BR /><P><B></B><IMG height="371" width="435" border="0" alt="View Chart Online" src="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/charts/chartofweek-09-01-09.gif" /></P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31346" href="http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31346">Read more at www.marketingsherpa.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/09/01/do-you-agree-or-disagree-that-social-media-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingsherpa.com/article.html?id=31346</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingsherpa.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Display as Effective as TV</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/28/online-display-as-effective-as-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/28/online-display-as-effective-as-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/28/online-display-as-effective-as-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The firms mentioned below are ComScore and dunnhumbyUSA.Clipped from www.adotas.comDuring 12 weeks, the two firms found that online ad campaigns with an average reach of 40 percent of their target audience led to a 9 percent increase in retail sales of the brands advertised.&#8220;These early results confirm the ability of online advertising to successfully build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>The firms mentioned below are ComScore and dunnhumbyUSA.</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: reload CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/" href="http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/">www.adotas.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>During 12 weeks, the two firms found that online ad campaigns with an average reach of 40 percent of their target audience led to a 9 percent increase in retail sales of the brands advertised.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>&#8220;These early results confirm the ability of online advertising to successfully build retail sales of CPG brands on par with the impact of television advertising,&#8221; said Gian Fulgoni, executive chairman of comScore.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/" href="http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/">Read more at www.adotas.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/28/online-display-as-effective-as-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.adotas.com/2009/08/display-ads-are-more-than-just-a-click/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.adotas.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Share of Ad Spend by Medium</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/27/share-of-ad-spend-by-medium/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/27/share-of-ad-spend-by-medium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/27/share-of-ad-spend-by-medium/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comSee more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 5908D1D5-60BF-4450-A659-EFE142102268 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-may-2009-10214/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-may-2009-10214/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-may-2009-10214/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/5908D1D5-60BF-4450-A659-EFE142102268/CD70ED9D-B6A7-44F7-9F64-D56F8CEA5539" alt="" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-may-2009-10214/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-may-2009-10214/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/27/share-of-ad-spend-by-medium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-may-2009-10214/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Media Use Eclipses Traditional for SMBs</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/21/digital-media-use-eclipses-traditional-for-smbs/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/21/digital-media-use-eclipses-traditional-for-smbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/21/digital-media-use-eclipses-traditional-for-smbs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comFor the first time, the small and mid-sized businesses using online media for advertising/promotion has eclipsed the percentage using traditional media SMBs reduced spend on ads and promotion 23.5% from August &#8216;08 to &#8216;09 Spend on websites and profile pages rose 26.8% in the same time period, despite a marked decrease in overall [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 494E302D-B0F0-42DE-89FD-ED364E38B5D9 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>For the first time, the small and mid-sized businesses using online media for advertising/promotion has eclipsed the percentage using traditional media</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI> SMBs reduced spend on ads and promotion 23.5% from August &#8216;08 to &#8216;09</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI> Spend on websites and profile pages rose 26.8% in the same time period, despite a marked decrease in overall ad spending.</LI><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/21/digital-media-use-eclipses-traditional-for-smbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/online-media-adpromo-use-eclipses-traditional-among-smbs-10190/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>ComScore: Online Ads Lift CPG Sales 9%, TV 8%</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/19/comscore-online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-tv-8/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/19/comscore-online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-tv-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/19/comscore-online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-tv-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article attributes some of the online success to tighter targeting.  Also important to note is that online media is generally cheaper than traditional TV.Clipped from www.marketingvox.comThe study, based on a 200,000 panel of consumers who were members of grocery store loyalty programs, indicated that online advertising lifts retail sales of CPG products by an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>The article attributes some of the online success to tighter targeting.  Also important to note is that online media is generally cheaper than traditional TV.</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 2A137722-9C7C-49C8-BAC0-31D9C3CB8289 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingvox.com/online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-on-par-with-tv-comscore-044880/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mv&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingvox.com/online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-on-par-with-tv-comscore-044880/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mv&amp;utm_medium=textlink">www.marketingvox.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingvox.com/online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-on-par-with-tv-comscore-044880/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mv&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The study, based on a 200,000 panel of consumers who were members of grocery store loyalty programs, indicated that online advertising lifts retail sales of CPG products by an average of 9%, compared to an average lift of about 8% from TV campaigns (measured by Information Resources, Inc. and published in their seminal research paper How Advertising Works).</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingvox.com/online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-on-par-with-tv-comscore-044880/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mv&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingvox.com/online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-on-par-with-tv-comscore-044880/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mv&amp;utm_medium=textlink">Read more at www.marketingvox.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/19/comscore-online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-tv-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingvox.com/online-ads-lift-cpg-sales-9-on-par-with-tv-comscore-044880/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mv&amp;utm_medium=textlink</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingvox.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity Endorsements Perceived as Not Very Effective</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/07/celebrity-endorsements-perceived-as-not-very-effective/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/07/celebrity-endorsements-perceived-as-not-very-effective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 14:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Clip</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/07/celebrity-endorsements-perceived-as-not-very-effective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.marketingcharts.comWhen respondents in the survey were asked whether the presence of a celebrity in an ad makes them more likely, less likely or neither more or less likely to buy the product, nearly 8 in 10 (78%) said it doesn&#8217;t sway them one way or the other.  In fact, only 8% said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 6EC75E63-950F-49A0-A0C5-1E2BAD0A1C2C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content8.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/bitbriefs.com/6EC75E63-950F-49A0-A0C5-1E2BAD0A1C2C/A2650F8A-4A0C-4501-AF45-E678CC476825" alt="adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009.jpg" width="384"></div></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>When respondents in the survey were asked whether the presence of a celebrity in an ad makes them more likely, less likely or neither more or less likely to buy the product, nearly 8 in 10 (78%) said it doesn&#8217;t sway them one way or the other.  In fact, only 8% said the presence of a celebrity spokesperson makes them more likely to buy a product. This compares with a&#160; significant 12% who actually say it makes them less likely to buy a product.</P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/">Read more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/07/celebrity-endorsements-perceived-as-not-very-effective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/topics/behavioral-marketing/celeb-product-hawkers-fail-to-sway-consumers-10042/adweek-linkedin-poll-overall-results-celebrity-ad-favorability-august-2009jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Word of Mouth Spending Data</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clipped from www.mediapost.comAccording to new research from PQ Media, spending on word-of-mouth marketing rose 14.2% to $1.54 billion in 2008, despite the worst economic recession in 70 years. However, WoM spending is on&#160;pace to grow another 10.2% this year, placing it among the fastest growing advertising and marketing segments.PQ Media defines WoM marketing as an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: C06853C3-B3AA-46D0-8C87-9069BD92F39C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>According to new research from PQ Media, spending on word-of-mouth marketing rose 14.2% to $1.54 billion in 2008, despite the worst economic recession in 70 years. However, WoM spending is on&#160;pace to grow another 10.2% this year, placing it among the fastest growing advertising and marketing segments.</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>PQ Media defines WoM marketing as an alternative marketing strategy which encourages consumers to dialogue about products and services through various online and offline tactics, often facilitated by brand ambassadors. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Industry spending increased at a compound annual growth rate of 37.6% from 2003 to 2008, as the rise in popularity of blogs, social networks and online communities led brands to shift dollars to WoM as part of integrated media solutions in their quest to engage more elusive consumers.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Total spending on WoM is expected to increase at a CAGR of 14.5% from 2008 to 2013. Both major sectors - content &amp; services and ancillary products - will post strong gains and contribute to overall growth. Ancillary products spending will increase faster than content &amp; services spending primarily because the market is smaller with more growth potential.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Patrick Quinn, President and CEO of PQ Media, notes that &#8220;The most influential marketer in a consumer&#8217;s life is someone they know and trust, such as a family member, friend or colleague&#8230;&#8221; </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TR><TD valign="top" colspan="2"><P><STRONG>% Share of WoM Spending by Marketers in 2008</STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Brand Market</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Share of WoM Spend</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Consumer Goods Products</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">17.4%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Food &amp; Drink</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">12.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Finance &amp; B2B Services</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.5%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Electronics &amp; Telecom</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.4%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Retail</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">9.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Auto &amp; Transportation</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">8.6%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Entertainment &amp; Media</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">7.5%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Apparel &amp; Accessories</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">6.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Health Care &amp; Pharma</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">4.1%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Sports &amp; Gaming</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.6%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Travel &amp; Leisure</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.3%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Home &amp; Garden</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">3.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Other</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">5.8%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Total</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">100.0%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top" colspan="2">   <P><EM>Source: PQ Media, July 2009</EM></P></TD></TR><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/05/word-of-mouth-spending-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=111077</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore Research:  Online Influences Offline Behavior</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Affiliate and Lead Gen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Analytics &amp; Measurement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[B2B Online Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Targeting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Electronics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Packaged Goods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversion Metrics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creative/Copy Best Practices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Demographics and Psychographics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing Case Studies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Finance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geographic Insights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare and Medicine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In-Game Advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail and eCommerce]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines - Google, Yahoo, MSN, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tips - Search Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel, Tourism and Hospitality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[User Generated - Blogs, Forums, Reviews, etc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Viral Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.mediapost.com
Several comScore studies have confirmed that online campaigns drive offline sales, according to Fulgoni. In the first study, comScore took four categories, 53 brands and 200 of the most trafficked sites. The company looked at people exposed to display advertising and what they did in the month following. Findings reveal that 18% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 319889F9-6558-41C0-A4BC-EF45731F1FA7 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>
Several comScore studies have confirmed that online campaigns drive offline sales, according to Fulgoni. In the first study, comScore took four categories, 53 brands and 200 of the most trafficked sites. The company looked at people exposed to display advertising and what they did in the month following. Findings reveal that 18% searched on the brand advertised and 29% went to the advertisers&#8217; sites. Consumers
who were exposed to the display advertising spent 55% more time than the average visitors to these sites the next month. The rise in time spent is matched by a similar increase in page views &#8212; about 51%. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>
Then, comScore analyzed the impact that online campaigns have on retail sales by matching the name and the address of consumers to retail loyalty card databases. The supermarket Kroger, for example, has issued about 60 million loyalty cards, which provide a massive data set to understand the degree that online search and display campaigns drive retail sales. The findings suggest a lift that is five times stronger when people are exposed to search ads alone, compared with display. Search alone produces an 82% lift, compared with display at 16%, and 119% when search and display are combined. About 82% of online ad campaigns measured by comScore have generated an average lift of 22% in CPG brand sales in retail stores. </P><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/08/03/comscore-research-online-influences-offline-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110891</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Spent Online Surpasses TV Amongst Boomers</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/28/time-spent-online-surpasses-tv-amongst-boomers/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/28/time-spent-online-surpasses-tv-amongst-boomers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr.Clip</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Usage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/07/28/time-spent-online-surpasses-tv-amongst-boomers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.marketingcharts.comMembers of the Baby-Boom generation are increasingly shifting away from traditional TV in favor of online services and entertainment, and now spend more free time online than they do watching TV, according to a study by ChangeWave Research. The May benchmark survey of business professionals ages 45-63, focused on TV viewing habits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 19E31C9F-3C55-4B93-9313-2A8BA1E0968E CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>Members of the Baby-Boom generation are increasingly shifting away from traditional TV in favor of online services and entertainment, and now spend more free time online than they do watching TV, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.changewave.com/freecontent/viewalliance.html?source=/freecontent/2009/06/boomer-tv-habits-06-15-09.html">according to</A> a study by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.changewave.com">ChangeWave Research</A>. </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The May benchmark survey of business professionals ages 45-63, focused on TV viewing habits vs. home internet usage. It found that Boomers spend an average of 12.9 hrs/week online, compared with only 11.8 hours/week watching traditional TV. It also found that many Boomers would be willing to give up their subscription TV service if they could get the same programming online.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/bitbriefs.com/19E31C9F-3C55-4B93-9313-2A8BA1E0968E/E39A031A-3A96-4DCB-95CA-FA09165E873A" alt="changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009.jpg" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/28/time-spent-online-surpasses-tv-amongst-boomers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/online-video-threatens-tv-among-boomers-9935/changewave-traditional-tv-viewing-vs-online-activities-may-2009jpg/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effectiveness of Media at Driving Consumers to the Web</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/21/effectiveness-of-media-at-driving-consumers-to-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/21/effectiveness-of-media-at-driving-consumers-to-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/07/21/effectiveness-of-media-at-driving-consumers-to-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.mediapost.comEffectiveness of Media at Driving Consumers to the Web             Medium         Effectiveness             Magazines         [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: BCE84AFD-920E-420D-A8AB-E40E1838B18C CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TR><TD width="266" valign="top" colspan="2"><P><STRONG>Effectiveness of Media at Driving Consumers to the Web</STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Medium</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Effectiveness</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Magazines</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">26.0%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Broadcast TV</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">17.8%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Cable TV</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">16.4%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Newspapers</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">13.7%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Radio</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">11.0%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Out of Home</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">8.2%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Other</P>   </TD>   <TD width="145" valign="top">   <P align="right">6.8%</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD width="266" valign="top" colspan="2">   <P><EM>Source: ICOM, American Advertising Federation (AAF)   2006, July 2009</EM></P></TD></TR><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/21/effectiveness-of-media-at-driving-consumers-to-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Print Ads With URLs Help Drive Users to the Web</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/21/print-ads-with-urls-help-drive-users-to-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/21/print-ads-with-urls-help-drive-users-to-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/07/21/print-ads-with-urls-help-drive-users-to-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duh!  Right?  However, good to see some hard research to back that up.Clipped from www.mediapost.comNew research from Affinity confirms that magazine ads with URLs are more likely to drive readers to&#160;advertiser websites overall, as well as across a range of genres. Even if &#8220;drive to web&#8221; is not the&#160;goal of the advertising campaign, including a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p>Duh!  Right?  However, good to see some hard research to back that up.</p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 316DBAA5-6624-44ED-9E47-0D750E42572F CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>New research from Affinity confirms that magazine ads with URLs are more likely to drive readers to&#160;advertiser websites overall, as well as across a range of genres. Even if &#8220;drive to web&#8221; is not the&#160;goal of the advertising campaign, including a URL to boost web visits is a benefit most&#160;advertisers will appreciate, says the report.</P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><P>The VISTA research is based on an analysis of 833 ads in seven different magazines representing six distinct magazine genres:&#160;&#160; </P></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TABLE cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1">  <TBODY><TR>   <TD width="387" valign="top" colspan="3">   <P><STRONG>Magazine Ads Driving Readers To Websites</STRONG> (Index)</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>&#160;</P>   </TD>   <TD width="158" valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Ads Without Web Address (Index 100)</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD width="170" valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Ads With Web Address Included (Index)</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Home</P>   </TD>   <TD width="158" valign="top">   <P align="right">100</P>   </TD>   <TD width="170" valign="top">   <P align="right">203</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Financial</P>   </TD>   <TD width="158" valign="top">   <P align="right">100</P>   </TD>   <TD width="170" valign="top">   <P align="right">122</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Fashion</P>   </TD>   <TD width="158" valign="top">   <P align="right">100</P>   </TD>   <TD width="170" valign="top">   <P align="right">152</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Men&#8217;s</P>   </TD>   <TD width="158" valign="top">   <P align="right">100</P>   </TD>   <TD width="170" valign="top">   <P align="right">138</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>Travel</P>   </TD>   <TD width="158" valign="top">   <P align="right">100</P>   </TD>   <TD width="170" valign="top">   <P align="right">286</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD width="387" valign="top" colspan="3">   <P><EM>Source: Vista/MPA, July 2009</EM></P>   </TD>  </TR> </TBODY></TABLE></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><TABLE cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1">  <TBODY><TR>   <TD valign="top" colspan="4">   <P><STRONG>Percent Visiting Brand Website</STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>&#160;</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Pre-Control</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Post-Control</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P><STRONG><EM>Point Difference</EM></STRONG></P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>No URL included</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">5%</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">7%</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">2</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top">   <P>URL included</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">13%</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">19%</P>   </TD>   <TD valign="top">   <P align="right">6</P>   </TD>  </TR>  <TR>   <TD valign="top" colspan="4">   <P><EM>Source: MarketingEvolution/MPA, July 2009</EM></P>   </TD>  </TR> </TBODY></TABLE><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/07/21/print-ads-with-urls-help-drive-users-to-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=110064</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey: Best Advertising Channels</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/15/survey-best-advertising-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/15/survey-best-advertising-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Networks, Ad Exchanges, Portals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media Mix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Direct Response]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Display &amp; Rich Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Online Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/06/15/survey-best-advertising-channels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.datranmediasurvey2009.comIn December 2008, Datran Media conducted its third annual marketing and media survey by reaching out to over 3,000 industry executives from Fortune 1000 brands and leading interactive agencies including Sony, Macy&#8217;s, Razorfish and RAPP . See more at www.datranmediasurvey2009.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 8AED61BC-C76D-48C3-9CCD-5CBB9A17F9F7 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/" href="http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/">www.datranmediasurvey2009.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><DIV align="justify" class="regular">In December 2008, Datran Media conducted its third annual marketing and media survey by reaching out to over 3,000 industry executives from Fortune 1000 brands and leading interactive agencies including Sony, Macy&#8217;s, Razorfish and RAPP . </DIV></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/8AED61BC-C76D-48C3-9CCD-5CBB9A17F9F7/6372D9CE-DD1D-4B7F-AA8E-81DB038DFFC2" alt="" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/" href="http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/">See more at www.datranmediasurvey2009.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/15/survey-best-advertising-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.datranmediasurvey2009.com/</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.datranmediasurvey2009.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Print Media Still 37% of Ad Revenue</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/10/print-media-still-37-of-ad-revenue/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/10/print-media-still-37-of-ad-revenue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Clipness</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Geographic Insights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Integration and Convergence]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Digital Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/06/10/print-media-still-37-of-ad-revenue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.mediapost.comDespite the global financial crisis, newspaper circulation grew 1.3%&#160;world-wide in 2008Global      newspaper circulation increased +1.3% in 2008, to almost 540&#160;million      daily sales, and was up +8.8% over five years. When free&#160;dailies are      added, circulation rose +1.62% in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: 06959144-DA5F-4DA9-B52B-5A656293D220 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454">www.mediapost.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Despite the global financial crisis, newspaper circulation grew 1.3%&#160;world-wide in 2008</td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>Global      newspaper circulation increased +1.3% in 2008, to almost 540&#160;million      daily sales, and was up +8.8% over five years. When free&#160;dailies are      added, circulation rose +1.62% in 2008 and +13%&#160;over five years.      &#160;Europe is the hotbed for free newspaper development: 23% of daily      newspapers in Europe were free in 2008.</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>Newspaper      circulation increased +6.9% in Africa last year, +1.8% in South America,      and +2.9% in Asia. It decreased -3.7% in North America, -2.5% in Australia      and Oceania, and -1.8% in Europe. In many mature markets where circulation      is&#160;declining, newspaper reach remains high &#8212; &#160;many European      countries continue&#160;to reach over 70% of the adult population with      paid newspapers alone.&#160;In Japan, it&#8217;s 91%. In North America, it&#8217;s 62%.</LI></td></tr></table></blockquote><div class="Clog_Content_Hr"></div><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><LI>Though      newspaper advertising revenues were down -5% in 2008, print&#160;media      still takes 37% of world advertising revenues.</LI><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454" href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454">Read more at www.mediapost.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/10/print-media-still-37-of-ad-revenue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107454</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.mediapost.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet 6.7% of Ad Spend</title>
		<link>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/03/internet-67-of-ad-spend/</link>
		<comments>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/03/internet-67-of-ad-spend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alvin and the Clipmunks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ad Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Marketing Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bitbriefs.com/2009/06/03/internet-67-of-ad-spend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No CommentaryClipped from www.marketingcharts.comSee more at www.marketingcharts.com&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="Clog_Commentary_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Post_Text"><p><span class="Clog_No_Commentary">No Commentary</span></p></div></div><div class="Clog_Content_Outer"><!-- BEGIN_CLOG_CONTENT ID: B5F5E0C7-BEC3-4BF3-822F-8B03CDB76AD3 CLOGS.CLIPMARKS.COM --><div class="Clog_Top_Wrap"><div class="Clog_Source_First"><span>Clipped from <a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-february-2009-9313/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-february-2009-9313/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></div></div><div class="Clog_Middle_Wrap"><blockquote class="Clog_Content_Item" cite="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-february-2009-9313/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td><div align="center" class="Clog_Content_Item_Image"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/clog_clip_cache/amplify.com/B5F5E0C7-BEC3-4BF3-822F-8B03CDB76AD3/223235D9-79A7-432C-8C6C-165DA04C8853" alt="" width="384"></div><span class="Clog_Source_Button"><a rel="clipsource" target="_blank" title="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-february-2009-9313/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink" href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-february-2009-9313/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">See more at www.marketingcharts.com</a></span></td></tr></table></blockquote></div><div class="Clog_Bottom_Wrap">&nbsp;</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bitbriefs.amplify.com/2009/06/03/internet-67-of-ad-spend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	<amplify:clipsource>http://www.marketingcharts.com/print/share-of-ad-spending-by-medium-february-2009-9313/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink</amplify:clipsource>
<amplify:clipsourceshort>www.marketingcharts.com</amplify:clipsourceshort>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
